Ever wondered about the minds that revolutionized our understanding of decision-making? What led two brilliant psychologists, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, to debunk traditional theories and introduce groundbreaking concepts like 'loss aversion' and 'Prospect Theory'? How did their work influence diverse fields from economics to medicine, and even the world of NBA recruiting? Dive into their fascinating journey, marked by intellectual breakthroughs, personal challenges and the profound impact of their legendary partnership.

The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds

In the high-stakes world of NBA recruiting, the Houston Rockets' interview room was a place where unexpected moments could upend your judgment. One memorable instance involved a player reacting with panic when asked if he could pass a drug test, and another chilling tale from a player who admitted to strangling his girlfriend to silence her. Kenneth Faried, on the other hand, simply wanted to be called "Manimal."

Rockets’ GM Daryl Morey had a unique challenge: balancing the charm and stories of these towering athletes with cold, hard data. Morey, a self-proclaimed numbers nerd, believed in a statistically driven approach to decision-making. His journey began with a fascination for using data to predict outcomes more accurately than so-called experts, a passion ignited by reading Bill James’ book on baseball statistics.

During his tenure, Morey faced numerous challenges, such as the failure of Joey Dorsey, a highly-rated draft pick who turned out to be a bust, and the oversight of DeAndre Jordan, who blossomed into a star. These experiences led him to refine his model, placing more weight on a player's age and performance against strong opponents.

Morey's skepticism extended to human judgment, especially how scouts could be easily misled by their biases. He observed confirmation bias, where scouts would see what they expected to see, and the endowment effect, overvaluing their own players. To counter these biases, he imposed rules such as forbidding racial comparisons when evaluating players.

One intriguing case involved a young giant from Punjab, Satnam Singh, whose extraordinary size and backstory made him a mystery. Despite his remarkable physical attributes, Morey decided to pass on him due to a lack of data, highlighting the uncertainties inherent in predicting future performance.

Morey's probabilistic approach to decision-making often clashed with the desire for certainty from team owners and fans. Yet, his methods led to consistent success, showing that even slight informational advantages could tilt the odds in their favor. His journey reflects a broader shift in professional sports and other industries towards data-driven decision-making, challenging conventional wisdom and revealing the complexities of the human mind in uncertain situations.

Can Daryl Morey's Data-Driven Approach Revolutionize NBA Recruiting?

Danny Kahneman, one of psychology's most influential figures, was defined by doubts, particularly about his own memory. Despite delivering lectures from memory and appearing to have an encyclopedic knowledge, he often claimed not to trust his recollections. This skepticism stemmed from a life filled with complex experiences, starting with his childhood in Nazi-occupied Paris.

In late 1941 or early 1942, young Danny, ashamed of the yellow Star of David he was forced to wear, would turn his sweater inside out. One evening, he encountered a feared SS soldier who surprisingly hugged him, showed him a picture of his son, and gave him money. This incident left Danny convinced of the complexity of human nature.

Danny's father, a chemist at L'Oréal, was arrested in a 1941 sweep but was released thanks to his employer, Eugène Schueller, who convinced the Nazis of his importance to the war effort. The Kahneman family fled to southern France, encountering numerous close calls and hardships, including living in a chicken coop. 

Danny's father passed away in 1944, an event that deeply impacted him. Post-war, the family moved to Palestine, where Danny, at 13, decided he did not believe in God. Despite the turmoil around him, he felt safer fighting for a cause than being a hunted Jew in Europe.

In Israel, Danny joined the scouts but quit, feeling disconnected from the collective identity. At 15, a vocational test suggested he become a psychologist, aligning with his interest in understanding human behavior. He studied psychology at Hebrew University, where he found inspiration in Gestalt psychology, which explored how the mind creates meaning and perceives reality.

After university, Danny served in the Israeli army, where he revolutionized the assessment process for recruits, creating a method to reduce the influence of interviewers' biases. His work had a lasting impact on the Israeli military and showcased his ability to derive broad truths from specific problems.

Danny's career was marked by a pattern of intense enthusiasm followed by self-doubt and abandonment of ideas. His early work in personality assessment and his later contributions to psychology demonstrated his unique ability to uncover phenomena and apply them broadly. Despite his profound influence, Danny remained skeptical about the impact of his childhood on his worldview, insisting that his past had little effect on his understanding or his work.

His story is one of resilience, intellectual curiosity, and a relentless pursuit of understanding human behavior, which has left an indelible mark on psychology.

Danny Kahneman: The Doubtful Genius Who Redefined Psychology

Amnon Rapoport, at just eighteen, was thrust into the Israeli army’s tank corps, a unit he didn't even know existed. His first combat mission in October 1956, avenging the murder of Israeli civilians, was a brutal introduction to warfare. 

Amidst the chaos, he learned quickly to make life-or-death decisions, an experience that starkly contrasted with youthful ideals. His vivid memory of paratroopers calmly reporting casualties during hand-to-hand combat left a deep impression on him. 

Two weeks later, Amnon drove his tank into Egypt, narrowly escaping strafing by both Egyptian and Israeli planes. The sudden switch from a killing machine to a compassionate human being amazed him when desperate, retreating Egyptian soldiers begged for water and protection.

After two years in the tank, Amnon sought solace working in a copper mine in the desert. His chance encounter with an ad for a psychology program at Hebrew University, while using a newspaper as improvised toilet paper, led him to a new path. Intrigued by the field, he applied and was accepted into Israel’s first psychology department.

In line for the entrance exam, Amnon met Amos Tversky, a small, pale paratrooper with a sharp mind. Amos, whose parents were Zionist pioneers, had a unique upbringing and a remarkable intellect. Despite his unassuming appearance, Amos's quick wit and deep insights made him unforgettable. 

Amos’ academic journey was a series of bold choices. Though he excelled in math and science, he pursued the humanities, drawn by a charismatic Hebrew literature teacher. His early experiences, including a near-drowning incident at a swimming pool and surviving rigorous paratrooper training, shaped his fearless character.

Amos’ bravery extended into combat, where he received a high military honor for saving a soldier during a live-fire exercise. His leadership in the army revealed a profound transformation, a testament to his resilience and adaptability.

After completing his military service, Amos joined the psychology program at Hebrew University, where he and Amnon became inseparable friends. Amos' strategic approach to intellectual life led him to abandon philosophy for psychology, seeking a field where he could make a significant impact.

Amos’ brilliance shone through in his studies. He dismissed many existing theories in psychology, particularly those involving decision-making and similarity judgments. His groundbreaking work challenged conventional wisdom, revealing that people’s judgments were not based on physical distance but on noticed features. This insight reshaped the understanding of human cognition and decision-making.

Amos’ unconventional methods and keen observations made him a standout in the academic world. His ability to simplify complex ideas and his fearless pursuit of truth left an indelible mark on psychology. Through his work, Amos Tversky demonstrated that the greatest insights often come from questioning the very foundations of accepted knowledge.

Could Amnon Rapoport and Amos Tversky's Wartime Experiences Have Shaped Modern Psychology?

When Amos returned to Israel in 1966 after five years in America, his friends noticed significant changes. He was now an assistant professor at Hebrew University, with a more serious, professional demeanor, and a penchant for suits chosen for their pockets. He also had a new wife, Barbara Gans, whom he met while studying psychology in Michigan. Barbara found Israel materially poor but rich in community, with personal interactions and a palpable sense of urgency due to the constant threat of war.

In May 1967, Egyptian President Gamal Nasser's announcement of closing the Straits of Tiran led to a nationwide mobilization in Israel. Amos, a former paratrooper, was called back to the army. Despite the tension, he remained confident in Israel's airpower. The Six-Day War began on June 5, and Israel's swift and decisive victory was seen as almost miraculous. Amos returned safely, having participated in significant battles and lost close friends.

Meanwhile, Danny Kahneman, a remarkable yet often insecure psychology professor, made a profound impact on his students with his unconventional teaching methods. He believed in using real-life examples and practical applications to teach complex concepts. Danny's classes at Hebrew University were famous for the diverse range of problems he posed, from designing counterfeit-resistant currency to teaching skills using simple games.

In one memorable instance, Danny introduced a prescription from the 12th century, challenging his students to decode it, emphasizing that true education meant knowing what to do when you didn’t know. His approach inspired students like Avi Henik, who decided to pursue psychology after experiencing Danny's dynamic teaching style. Danny's relentless curiosity and willingness to explore various psychological phenomena, from pupil dilation to subliminal perception, defined his career and teaching philosophy.

The arrival of Amos Tversky in Danny's class marked the beginning of a legendary partnership, one that would revolutionize the understanding of human decision-making and cognitive biases, laying the groundwork for the field of behavioral economics.

The Birth of Behavioral Economics: When Tversky Met Kahneman

Danny and Amos coexisted at the University of Michigan but rarely crossed paths. Danny, focused on psychological applications, and Amos, a mathematical psychologist, seemed worlds apart. 

However, in 1969, Amos attended Danny's seminar at Hebrew University, sparking curiosity among students who perceived a rivalry between the two. Their initial interactions were marked by skepticism, especially after Amos presented a study on decision-making using poker chips, which Danny found unconvincing.

The study, rooted in Bayes theorem, involved participants drawing poker chips from bags with known ratios of red to white chips and estimating the odds of which bag they had. The psychologists wanted to see if people intuitively followed Bayesian logic. Amos reported that while people adjusted their guesses in the right direction, they were overly conservative, a concept dubbed "conservative Bayesians."

Danny, however, saw flaws in this idea. He believed people were not natural statisticians and often leapt to conclusions from insufficient data. This skepticism led to a heated debate during which Danny challenged Amos' acceptance of the research.

Amos' encounter with Danny sparked a shift in his thinking. He began to question the prevailing theories in decision-making psychology. This change was evident to his friends, who noticed his growing doubts about human judgment and perception.

Despite their differences, Danny and Amos developed a close working relationship, bonding over their shared interest in human intuition and errors in judgment. They collaborated on a paper titled "Belief in the Law of Small Numbers," which argued that people, including trained statisticians, often misjudged the reliability of small samples, believing them to be more representative of the population than they were.

Their paper, infused with humor and confidence, challenged the conventional wisdom of the time. It demonstrated that even experts tended to draw broad conclusions from limited data. This insight had significant implications for social science, highlighting the human tendency to overinterpret small samples.

Their work received praise for its groundbreaking ideas, particularly from respected figures like Dave Krantz, who recognized its importance in understanding human judgment. The collaboration between Danny and Amos proved transformative, leading to a deeper exploration of how people make decisions and interpret probabilities. This partnership laid the foundation for a new understanding of human cognition, challenging long-held assumptions and opening new avenues of research.

Could the Unlikely Duo of Danny and Amos Revolutionize Our Understanding of Human Judgment?

In 1960, Paul Hoffman, a psychology professor at the University of Oregon, frustrated with the slow pace of academic life, left his teaching job to found the Oregon Research Institute (ORI) with a $60,000 grant. Housed in a former Unitarian church in Eugene, this unique institution soon attracted unconventional projects and fascinating people. 

One notable assignment came from the contractors building the World Trade Center in Manhattan. Concerned about how much the skyscrapers would sway in the wind, the engineers approached Hoffman, who ingeniously built a “sway room” to simulate the sensation. This experiment revealed that people were more sensitive to movement than anticipated, leading to the addition of shock absorbers in the towers—a modification that possibly saved lives on 9/11.

The ORI researchers, including Paul Slovic and Lew Goldberg, were intrigued by human judgment and decision-making, particularly inspired by Paul Meehl’s work showing that simple algorithms often outperformed human experts in predictions. They sought to understand the intricacies of expert judgment to potentially improve it.

Goldberg’s experiments showed that doctors and other experts often disagreed with each other and even with themselves when diagnosing patients, suggesting that their judgments were unreliable. Surprisingly, simple models created from the experts’ own criteria often outperformed the experts.

Meanwhile, in the early 1970s, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman joined ORI, bringing with them groundbreaking ideas about human judgment. They conducted experiments that demonstrated how people rely on mental shortcuts, or heuristics, which often lead to systematic errors. For example, when judging probabilities, people often use the "representativeness" heuristic, leading them to make errors based on how much something resembles their mental model of a category.

Another heuristic they identified was "availability," where people judge the likelihood of events based on how easily they can recall similar instances. This often leads to overestimating the probability of dramatic events, like car crashes or plane accidents, because such events are more memorable.

Tversky and Kahneman’s work revealed that these mental shortcuts, while sometimes useful, could mislead people, especially in complex, uncertain situations. Their research laid the foundation for understanding cognitive biases and has had a profound impact on fields ranging from economics to medicine.

Their collaboration at ORI was marked by intense, joyful exchanges of ideas, leading to seminal papers that challenged conventional wisdom about human rationality. Despite the academic setting, their work was deeply personal and transformative, highlighting the power of partnership in scientific discovery.

From Sway Rooms to Cognitive Biases: How ORI Transformed Psychology with Tversky and Kahneman

Amos had a unique approach to decision-making: never say "yes" immediately. He used this tactic to manage his time and escape from dull events, simply walking away when needed. His minimalist philosophy even extended to throwing away anything he didn't find immediately useful. Among the few things he saved was a scrap of paper with early thoughts on prediction and judgment, a collaboration with his partner Danny. 

They aimed to understand how people make predictions, often blending judgment and uncertainty. Their next paper, "On the Psychology of Prediction," explored how people use heuristics instead of statistical reasoning, leading to systematic errors. Inspired by Danny's military experience, they devised experiments to test how people predict outcomes based on personality traits. Subjects ignored data in favor of stereotypes, illustrating the representativeness heuristic.

In another experiment, they used irrelevant information to see if it influenced predictions, and it did, demonstrating how easily people could be swayed by worthless data. Their work showed that people’s confidence in their predictions often led to less accuracy—an insight that resonated with historians, who also imposed false order on random events. Amos called this "creeping determinism," which makes the past seem predictable and blinds us to future surprises.

Their insights began to attract broader interest, notably from Irv Biederman, who foresaw their impact on fields like economic planning and medical diagnosis. By 1972, their groundbreaking work hinted at a Nobel Prize in economics, as it explained human irrationalities through psychological mechanisms.

Danny and Amos's ideas found a receptive audience in Don Redelmeier, a doctor at Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto. Redelmeier had been fascinated by their work since reading their article on heuristics and biases as a teenager. He applied their insights to medical decision-making, often identifying how cognitive biases led to clinical misjudgments. For instance, he once saved a car crash victim by questioning a hasty diagnosis linked to her thyroid, ultimately discovering a collapsed lung.

Redelmeier’s collaboration with Amos was transformative, leading to studies that debunked myths like arthritis pain being linked to the weather. Danny also influenced Redelmeier, especially with his exploration of how people misremember pain, which led to experiments that improved patients' willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopies by altering their memory of the procedure's discomfort.

In the end, Amos and Danny's work revealed deep truths about human judgment and decision-making, impacting fields far beyond psychology. Their legacy, carried forward by collaborators like Redelmeier, continues to challenge and refine our understanding of how we think and decide.

How Did Amos and Danny Revolutionize Our Understanding of Human Decision-Making?

By the fall of 1973, Danny Kahneman realized that few people could truly grasp his extraordinary bond with Amos Tversky. Their relationship was intellectually intense, more profound than a marriage, even though they often competed or completed each other's thoughts in public. This closeness took them through some harrowing times, including the Yom Kippur War.

When war erupted, Danny and Amos, both in the U.S. at the time, immediately returned to Israel, finding ways to contribute as field psychologists amidst the chaos. The Israeli army, overwhelmed and unprepared, suffered significant losses. Amos and Danny observed and addressed the psychological impact on soldiers, uncovering raw insights about fear and motivation.

The war exposed the limitations of traditional decision-making models. Danny and Amos, having already questioned the reliability of human judgment, now faced the inadequacies of decision analysis. They recognized that leaders often ignored numerical probabilities, preferring their gut instincts, rendering efforts to introduce rigorous decision-making frameworks largely futile.

Their work dived deeper into human psychology, especially the concept of regret. They found that people anticipated regret and adjusted their decisions to minimize it, rather than purely maximizing utility. This insight led them to explore how decisions were influenced by the potential for regret, especially when choosing between a sure thing and a gamble.

Amos and Danny's collaboration was fueled by a shared passion for understanding human behavior. They conducted experiments revealing how people's perception of regret affected their choices, and how this emotion was tied to responsibility and proximity to success. Despite their groundbreaking insights, they realized that integrating psychology into decision theory was complex.

Their journey highlighted the tension between rational theories and the messy reality of human emotions. Through their intense partnership, they reshaped the understanding of decision-making, showing that to predict behavior accurately, one must account for the psychological nuances that drive human choices.

How Kahneman and Tversky Revolutionized Decision-Making in the Shadow of War

Amos and Danny, two brilliant minds, often found it hard to track the origins of their ideas, viewing them as a blend of their collaborative interactions. One notable idea, however, clearly began with Danny: the sensitivity of people to changes when making risky decisions. 

Their defining moment came in 1974 when Amos flipped the signs on their hypothetical gambles, changing gains to losses. This shift revealed a profound insight: people become risk seekers when faced with losses, preferring a gamble over a certain loss, but risk-averse when it comes to gains, opting for a sure thing over a gamble.

This discovery, dubbed "loss aversion," showed that the pain of losing is more powerful than the pleasure of gaining. It wasn't just about money; it was a fundamental aspect of human emotion, likely rooted in evolutionary survival. Amos and Danny's work debunked the theory of regret they had worked on for over a year, moving them towards a more promising theory of decision-making under risk.

Their theory had three key insights: people respond to changes rather than absolute values, they handle gains and losses differently, and they don't process probabilities straightforwardly. People often overestimate small probabilities and underestimate large ones, leading to irrational behaviors like buying lottery tickets and insurance.

By 1975, Danny and Amos were refining their theory, now called "Prospect Theory," which they presented at a prestigious economics conference in Jerusalem. The reaction was mixed; some economists saw the potential disruption to their field, while others, like Richard Thaler, embraced it. Thaler, struggling in his own career, found in their work a validation of his observations about irrational human behaviors that traditional economics couldn't explain.

Thaler's list of irrational behaviors, like the endowment effect, where people overvalue what they own, found a theoretical foundation in Prospect Theory. This theory articulated that people's choices could be manipulated simply by how options were framed, a concept known as "framing." For example, people would react differently to a program saving 200 out of 600 people versus one where 400 out of 600 would die, even though the outcomes were mathematically identical.

As their work gained traction, Amos and Danny faced personal and professional challenges, including Danny's move to the U.S. and Amos' eventual decision to join him, leaving behind their life in Israel. Despite these upheavals, their collaboration produced groundbreaking insights into human nature, transforming the fields of psychology and economics.

Their journey, marked by personal sacrifice and intellectual breakthroughs, culminated in the formal presentation of Prospect Theory, fundamentally challenging the assumption of human rationality and reshaping the understanding of decision-making under uncertainty. This theory, blending psychological insights with economic logic, opened new avenues for exploring human behavior and its implications in real-world scenarios.

Did Amos and Danny's Prospect Theory Revolutionize Our Understanding of Human Decision-Making?

In the late 1970s, Miles Shore, the new superintendent of the Massachusetts Mental Health Center and a Harvard professor, faced a dilemma: whether to promote J. Allan Hobson, a medical researcher famous for debunking Freudian dream theories. Hobson’s key problem? He collaborated closely with Robert McCarley, making it challenging to isolate individual contributions—a requirement in academia.

Shore's curiosity led him to explore the dynamics of other collaborative pairs. He interviewed various duos, including a comedy duo, concert pianists, mystery writers, and nutritionists. He found that successful partnerships often resulted in an indistinguishable blend of contributions, but this also led to strains in personal relationships.

Among the pairs Shore interviewed were Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, psychologists known for their groundbreaking work in decision-making. They candidly discussed their collaboration's challenges, including the impact on their marriages and the public's skewed perception of their contributions. Kahneman admitted to feeling overshadowed by Tversky, which strained their relationship.

Their partnership faced a significant test when academic offers started pouring in. Tversky received a fast-tracked offer from Stanford, while Kahneman ended up in Vancouver. Though they initially agreed to fly to see each other every other weekend, the distance began to affect their collaboration.

During this period, Kahneman became engrossed in understanding "counterfactual emotions"—how people imagine alternative realities to cope with regret, frustration, and envy. He conducted experiments to explore how people’s emotional responses are influenced by how close they came to a different outcome.

Tversky, meanwhile, was intrigued but less involved, partly due to his busy schedule and perhaps a sense of homesickness after moving to the U.S. Despite their efforts, the physical separation highlighted their individual contributions, creating further tension.

Their collaboration officially began to unravel during a lecture at the University of Michigan, where Kahneman unveiled his new ideas. When asked about their work, Tversky's response indicated a disconnect, marking the beginning of the end for their partnership.

Shore, who never wrote his book on fertile pairs, later sent Kahneman an audiotape of their interview. Listening to it, Kahneman realized their collaboration was truly over. Despite their groundbreaking work and mutual respect, the personal and professional challenges proved too great to maintain their partnership.

Unraveling Genius: The Complex Dynamics of Kahneman and Tversky's Legendary Collaboration

In 1984, Amos was in Israel when he received a call informing him that he had been awarded the prestigious MacArthur "genius" grant. The recognition included a hefty monetary award and a press release celebrating Amos's originality. However, the release only mentioned his collaborative work with Danny but not Danny himself, which upset Amos. He was known to dislike prizes, believing they created unnecessary divisions and misery among those who didn't win.

Despite his disdain, Amos continued to receive accolades, including a Guggenheim Fellowship and an invitation to join the National Academy of Sciences—a rarity for non-U.S. citizens, and an honor not extended to Danny. This exclusion became a sore point for Amos, who believed the recognition of only one partner in their collaborative work was detrimental.

Amos's fame grew, and he was often credited alone for their joint achievements. He even received a nickname from his graduate students: "Famous Amos." However, Amos seemed indifferent to the attention, often ignoring media requests and invitations. He valued his work and opinions but didn't care much for public approval.

Amos's influence reached unexpected places, including the U.S. Congress, the NBA, and even the Secret Service, who all sought his advice on various issues. For instance, Delta Air Lines consulted him to understand why their pilots made poor decisions under stress. Amos advised them to change their decision-making environments rather than trying to eliminate human error, leading to a significant change in cockpit culture.

However, the partnership with Danny began to strain. Danny noticed that Amos was receiving more attention for their joint work, and it affected him. Their collaboration had always been a blend of Amos's brilliance and Danny's meticulousness, but the public perception skewed towards Amos being the more significant contributor. This imbalance started to erode their relationship.

Despite their differences, they continued to work together, producing groundbreaking papers like the one on the "conjunction fallacy," demonstrated through the famous "Linda problem." This experiment showed how people's judgment often defied logic when influenced by stereotypes and representative details.

Yet, the joy of collaboration was fading. Danny felt Amos had stopped valuing his input, and their interactions became increasingly fraught. Their personal and professional relationship deteriorated, leading Danny to move to Princeton to distance himself from Amos.

Their story took a poignant turn when Amos was diagnosed with terminal cancer. Despite their strained relationship, this news brought a moment of reconciliation. It reminded them of the deep connection they once shared and the remarkable achievements they had accomplished together.

Their journey underscores the complexities of collaboration, fame, and friendship, revealing how intellectual partnerships can be as fragile and profound as any personal relationship.

Can Fame and Fortune Tear Apart Even the Greatest Intellectual Partnerships?

The legendary partnership of psychologists Danny Kahneman and Amos Tversky revolutionized understanding of human decision-making. Danny's journey began in Nazi-occupied Paris, where a kind SS soldier's unexpected compassion left a lasting impression. Post-war, his family moved to Palestine, where his interest in psychology blossomed. Serving in the Israeli army, Danny revolutionized the assessment process, reducing interview biases—a precursor to his future work.

Amos's story was equally compelling. Thrust into the Israeli army’s tank corps at eighteen, his combat experiences shaped his fearless character. A chance encounter led him to psychology, where his strategic intellect shone. Meeting Danny at Hebrew University marked the start of their groundbreaking collaboration.

Their seminal paper, "Belief in the Law of Small Numbers," challenged the reliability of small samples, revealing human tendencies to overinterpret limited data. This work laid the foundation for understanding cognitive biases, reshaping fields from economics to medicine.

At the Oregon Research Institute, their experiments demonstrated how mental shortcuts, or heuristics, often led to errors. Their research into "representativeness" and "availability" heuristics showed that people frequently misjudged probabilities based on memory and stereotypes.

Their theory of "Prospect Theory" furthered this understanding, showing that people are risk-averse with gains and risk-seeking with losses. This discovery of "loss aversion" was groundbreaking, explaining irrational behaviors like lottery ticket purchases and insurance.

Despite professional success, personal tensions grew. Danny's move to the U.S. and Amos's eventual decision to join him strained their collaboration. Amos's increasing fame, marked by awards like the MacArthur "genius" grant, further complicated their relationship.

Their partnership, though strained, produced transformative insights. The "Linda problem" and the "conjunction fallacy" highlighted how stereotypes influence judgment, defying logical reasoning.

As Amos's health declined, a reconciliation reminded them of their deep connection and shared achievements. Their journey underscored the complexities of collaboration, fame, and friendship, highlighting the profound impact of their intellectual partnership on the understanding of human behavior.

Home

Trending Books

News & Mags

Relax

Curated

Collections

Key Ideas & Notes

Insights

Highlights & Bookmarks

Listening History