Are we on the brink of the sixth mass extinction, driven by our own actions? How is human interference reshuffling ecosystems and speeding up the extinction of species? Can we halt the devastating trend and save the remaining biodiversity on our planet? Are we ready to bear the burden of being the species that caused the Sixth Extinction? Dive in to explore these burning questions and understand our crucial role in the future of our planet.

The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History

Welcome to the town of El Valle de Antón, Panama, nestled within a volcanic crater, where golden frog figurines are as common as Panama hats. This golden frog, a symbol of luck in Panama, is under threat. A decade ago, these vividly colored, toxic creatures were a common sight. Today, they have started disappearing mysteriously.

This unfortunate story began near Panama’s border with Costa Rica, where an American graduate student noticed the sudden absence of frogs and amphibians during her research. The problem was a spreading blight, wiping out frog populations and reaching the town of Santa Fe, west of El Valle. Biologists, sensing an impending crisis, attempted to preserve the golden frog population by raising the frogs in a local bed and breakfast, playfully called the “frog hotel,” until a new lab facility was ready. 

Later, an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences painted a grim picture. The authors, David Wake and Vance Vredenburg, argued that we are currently witnessing the sixth mass extinction, driven by human intervention. Such mass extinctions are exceedingly rare, having occurred only five times in the past half a billion years. The notion that we are not just witnessing, but also driving such an event is mind-boggling. 

The golden frogs’ plight is not an isolated case; it is part of a bigger, global problem. Amphibians are among the world’s most endangered animals, with their extinction rate estimated to be 45,000 times higher than the background rate. 

This mass extinction is not limited to frogs; significant proportions of corals, mollusks, sharks, rays, mammals, reptiles, and birds are also heading towards extinction. The cause? Our species. Our activities are reshuffling ecosystems and introducing deadly pathogens like the chytrid fungus into new environments at an unprecedented rate.

As we stand at the precipice of this sixth mass extinction, the questions that loom are: Can we halt this devastating trend? And if so, how? The survival of the golden frog and countless other species depend on our ability to find the answers.

Are We on the Brink of the Sixth Mass Extinction Caused by Humans?

Have you ever wondered about the fascinating history of the concept of extinction? It's not as straightforward as you may think. 

The journey begins with Aristotle, who wrote a ten-book History of Animals without ever considering the possibility that animals actually had a history. Fast forward to the Enlightenment period, and every species was viewed as a link in an unbreakable “chain of being.” But then, Carl Linnaeus introduced his system of binomial nomenclature, and he made no distinction between the living and the dead because, in his view, none was required. 

However, evidence to the contrary began to pile up. Cabinets of curiosities were filled with traces of strange creatures that no one had ever seen—remains of animals that would now be identified as trilobites, belemnites, and ammonites. Mammoth bones from Siberia also began making their way to Europe. These were shoehorned into the system, believed to be remnants of animals washed north during the great flood of Genesis. 

The concept of extinction finally emerged thanks to one man, the naturalist Jean Cuvier, and one creature, the American mastodon. Cuvier was a visionary and a reactionary, whose tragic vision of earth history has come to seem prophetic. He identified multiple extinct species and developed the theory of cataclysmic extinction events.

Cuvier's work was significant, but he was not without his critics. His contemporary, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, proposed a different explanation for the disappearance of species. He suggested that animals could change their body types when necessary - a theory that Cuvier found absurd. 

Cuvier's ideas about extinction were influential and quickly spread around the globe. However, much of his theory has been disproven today. We now know that the physical evidence Cuvier used to support his theory actually reflects gradual changes in sea level and the effects of plate tectonics. 

Despite this, some of Cuvier's claims have proven surprisingly accurate. Life on earth has indeed been disturbed by "terrible events" and such events cannot be explained by the forces at work in the present. So, extinction, it seems, is not as simple as we once thought. 

Unraveling Extinction: Cuvier's Controversial Legacy and the Evolution of a Concept

In 1832, William Whewell, one of the first presidents of the Geological Society of London, coined the term "catastrophist." He used it to describe scientists, including himself, who believed that the Earth's geological features were the result of sudden, violent events. 

However, a young geologist named Charles Lyell disagreed with this view. Lyell proposed the concept of "uniformitarianism," arguing that the Earth's geological features were the result of slow processes acting over millions of years. His ideas were widely accepted and became the foundation of modern geology.

Lyell's thinking also influenced Charles Darwin, who applied similar principles to biology. Darwin proposed that species evolve gradually over time through a process of natural selection. This theory eliminated the need for divine intervention in the creation and extinction of species.

Darwin's theory was revolutionary, but it faced a significant challenge: the extinction of the great auk. The great auk was a flightless bird native to the North Atlantic. By the time Europeans arrived in the New World, the great auk population was already declining due to hunting. The last known pair of great auks was killed on Eldey, an island off the coast of Iceland, in 1844.

The extinction of the great auk contradicted Darwin's theory. According to Darwin, extinction should be a slow process, just like evolution. Yet, the great auk had disappeared within a few decades. This led some scientists to question whether human-caused extinction is a separate category of extinction, or whether it can be explained by natural selection. The debate continues to this day. 

Can Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection Explain Human-Caused Extinctions?

Gubbio is a historic town hundred miles north of Rome with unchanged, ancient architecture. If we move closer to the edge of town, we would stumble upon a narrow gorge known as the Gola del Bottaccione. The gorge, with its diagonal stripes of limestone, is a unique journey through time, where a few hundred yards can equate to almost a hundred million years. 

Did you know that long before humans ever existed, Gubbio lay at the bottom of a clear, blue sea? The remains of tiny marine creatures fell to the sea floor, building up over time to form the limestone that now makes up the stunning Gola del Bottaccione. It's a fascinating piece of natural history.

This gorge is now a tourist attraction for a specialized crowd. It was here that a geologist named Walter Alvarez accidentally rewrote the history of life in the late 1970s. He discovered the first traces of the giant asteroid that ended the Cretaceous period and resulted in the worst day ever on planet earth. This catastrophic event wiped out three-quarters of all species. 

Alvarez's discovery was controversial and met with significant pushback from the scientific community. However, as more evidence accumulated, including the discovery of a hundred-mile-wide crater beneath the Yucatán Peninsula, many scientists were eventually convinced. Despite the initial resistance, Alvarez's asteroid impact hypothesis drastically changed our understanding of earth's history. 

It's intriguing to think about how a single catastrophic event can have such far-reaching effects, isn't it? From the extinction of dinosaurs to a major shift in the earth's biodiversity, the impact of that asteroid is still felt today. So, next time you look up at the stars, remember that our earth's history is interwoven with the wider universe in ways we're still discovering.

Unearthing Secrets of Extinction: Visit to Gubbio's Historic Gorge, Site of Alvarez's Groundbreaking Discovery

In 1949, Harvard psychologists conducted an experiment with undergraduates to study perception. They showed the students a series of playing cards, some of which were doctored with oddities. When the cards were shown rapidly, students overlooked the differences and forced the cards into a familiar framework. When the cards were shown slowly, they struggled to make sense of the differences. 

This experiment intrigued Thomas Kuhn, a historian of science, who saw it as a model for how people process disruptive information. He argued in his seminal work, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," that this pattern shaped not only individual perceptions but entire fields of inquiry. This is how great scientific discoveries or "paradigm shifts" take place. 

The history of the science of extinction can be seen as a series of these paradigm shifts. Until the end of the 18th century, the concept of extinction didn't exist. The discovery of strange bones from creatures like mammoths and mosasaurs challenged this, leading to the realization that life had a history marked by loss and catastrophic events. 

However, as more extinct creatures were discovered, the framework began to crack. The number of disasters needed to explain the growing fossil record had to keep multiplying. 

But then, with the discovery of the iridium layer, science faced another crisis. It was found that catastrophes did happen, leading to a new way of understanding geology that combined elements of both gradual and sudden change. This leads us to the present day, where we are witnessing another paradigm shift. 

Humans have caused significant changes to the earth's ecosystems, leading some to argue that we have entered a new epoch, the Anthropocene. This term, coined by Dutch chemist Paul Crutzen, refers to the current geological epoch in which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment. 

The Anthropocene is characterized by unprecedented changes such as alterations to the earth's biota due to human activity, including the transportation of flora and fauna across the globe. This human-induced extinction event will leave its own distinctive mark in the geological record. 

Furthermore, human activity has altered the composition of the atmosphere, raising the level of carbon dioxide significantly, which in turn has increased the acidity of the oceans, threatening marine life. 

Are We Ignoring the Alarming Reality of the Anthropocene Epoch?

Halfway around the world from the ancient fortress of Castello Aragonese lies One Tree Island, nestled at the southern tip of Australia's Great Barrier Reef. Contrary to its misleading name, the island boasts more than one tree and is devoid of sand, being composed entirely of coral rubble of various shapes and sizes. Formed during a fierce storm some four thousand years ago, the island is ever-changing, with Cyclone Hamish in 2009 adding a new ridge along its eastern shore.

A tiny research station run by the University of Sydney is the island's sole human habitation. The research station is a basic setup, with cabins and labs that rest directly on the coral rubble, making it feel as if you're always outdoors. Scientists from around the world visit to study the island’s unique ecosystem, leaving behind inscriptions on the cabin walls to commemorate their work.

One such study focused on the impacts of ocean acidification on corals. Led by Ken Caldeira, an atmospheric scientist from Stanford, the team aimed to measure changes in calcification rates by comparing current water samples with data from the 1970s. The experiment was simple but required meticulous data collection during low tides, often involving nighttime trips across the brittle, flat reef.

During one such nighttime journey, Caldeira and a visitor navigated the dark, cracking "pie crust" of the reef, encountering loggerhead turtles, vibrant starfish, stranded sharks, and giant clams along the way. The darkness was complete, the stars intensely bright, evoking a sense of what early explorers like Captain James Cook might have felt arriving at such remote locales.

Historically, coral reefs have been a marvel and a mystery. Early explorers like Cook and scientists like Darwin and Lyell pondered their origins, with Darwin eventually proposing the subsidence theory that reefs formed around sinking islands. This theory was later confirmed by core samples taken during the U.S. Navy's H-bomb tests in the Marshall Islands.

Coral reefs are living structures built by tiny polyps that engage in communal construction projects, creating habitats that support an astonishing diversity of life. The Great Barrier Reef alone stretches over 1,500 miles and is a critical ecosystem for countless species.

However, reefs are now in peril due to human activities. Ocean acidification, driven by increased CO2 levels, threatens to slow or halt coral calcification, leading to the potential ecological extinction of reefs within this century. Studies show that as CO2 dissolves in seawater, it lowers the saturation state of aragonite, the form of calcium carbonate that corals use to build their skeletons. This makes it harder for corals to grow and maintain their structures against natural forces.

Despite the challenges, the beauty and vibrancy of the reef continue to draw scientists and visitors alike. Snorkeling off One Tree Island reveals a surreal underwater world teeming with life, from colorful fish to majestic rays and turtles. Yet, the future of these reefs looks grim if current trends continue.

One Tree Island and other reefs face a multitude of threats, including overfishing, pollution, and climate change. These stresses make corals more susceptible to diseases and bleaching events, which have become more frequent and severe with rising ocean temperatures.

As researchers continue their work, they are acutely aware of the urgency to understand and mitigate these impacts. The fate of coral reefs, and the myriad species they support, hangs in the balance, making the work of scientists on islands like One Tree all the more critical.

Battle for Survival: The Threat to Coral Reefs and the Crucial Research at Australia's One Tree Island

Hidden away in the heart of the Amazon is the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP), one of the world’s largest and longest-running experiments. This area is home to an array of reserves, each named clinically and numbered from 1112 to 2107. These reserves, surrounded by a sea of scrub, appear as islands of untouched rainforest within the vast Amazon.

Brazilian conservationists and cattle ranchers collaborated to create the BDFFP, as a response to a governmental program in the 1970s aiming to encourage ranching in the Amazon. Ranchers would receive a stipend for deforesting land for cattle grazing, but the law also required them to leave half of the forest on their property untouched. This tension ignited the idea for the BDFFP - what if scientists could decide which trees to cut down and which trees to preserve?

In this way, the BDFFP became a controlled study of deforestation, a phenomenon occurring globally at an alarming rate. Research conducted in the BDFFP has shown a gradual decrease in the diversity of species over time, highlighting the damaging effects of deforestation. 

But what happens when the process is reversed? When deforestation stops, and previously deforested areas regrow? Interestingly, even in these areas, the number and variety of species continue to decline over time. This slow degradation of diversity suggests that the damage inflicted by deforestation cannot be easily reversed.

The BDFFP is just one example of how human activity is rapidly changing the world, creating a new era called the Anthropocene. In this era, we're reshuffling the world's flora and fauna, leading to what biologists refer to as the 'New Pangaea'. In this new world, species are being transported at unprecedented rates, leading to an increase in local diversity but a decrease in global diversity.

In the face of such drastic changes, the question arises: how do we preserve the world's biodiversity? One approach is through projects like the BDFFP, where controlled experiments can help us understand the impacts of our actions. But perhaps more importantly, we must also reassess our relationship with the natural world, recognizing that our actions today will shape the world's biodiversity for generations to come. 

Can We Reverse the Alarming Effects of Deforestation and Save Global Biodiversity?

Isn't it fascinating how sometimes the smallest of actions can create a ripple effect of change that can transform the world? Consider the tale of Suci, the Sumatran rhino.

Suci was a resident of the Cincinnati Zoo born in 2004 and is part of the smallest and oldest species of rhinoceros, the Sumatran rhino. Her lineage traces back almost 20 million years, and her species is considered a "living fossil."

Suci's story opens up discussions around the survival of her species. With less than a hundred Sumatran rhinos left in the world, their survival depends on scientists like Dr. Terri Roth, who dedicated their lives to developing techniques to stimulate ovulation and perform artificial insemination, all in the hopes of preserving this ancient species.

But why are these creatures on the brink of extinction? Is it solely due to human interference or could climate change be playing a part?

There's a theory about the megafauna extinction (the disappearance of large animals) that happened in pulses, first in Australia 40,000 years ago, then in America, Madagascar, and New Zealand. The timing of these pulses aligns almost exactly with human settlement in these areas. Archaeological evidence also implicates humans, with residues of large animal bones found in ancient human settlements.

This brings us to the question - are humans inherently destructive? Research by John Alroy, a paleobiologist, suggests that humans could have wiped out large animals with only modest effort. His simulations showed that a small initial population of humans could account for most of the extinctions over a millennium or two.

The tale of Suci and her species isn't just about preserving the past. It's about understanding our role in shaping the future. Can we learn from history and change the destructive patterns of our ancestors? Only time will tell. 

Suci's Tale: Unraveling the Human Role in the Survival of the Sumatran Rhino

In the Neander Valley near Cologne, Germany, the bones of the Neanderthal man were discovered in 1856. Since then, these ancient human ancestors have been the subject of much fascination and scientific study. 

Visitors to the valley can explore a museum dedicated to Neanderthals, try out a booth that morphs their faces to look like a Neanderthal, and even enjoy a Neanderthal-themed beer. 

Neanderthals have been found all over Europe and the Middle East, hinting at their once widespread existence. Their tools suggest they were skilled hunters and craftspeople, and their presence in Europe for at least a hundred thousand years indicates they were well-adapted to their environment. However, around 30,000 years ago, they vanished. Theories abound, but it's increasingly clear that modern humans played a significant role in their disappearance.

Interestingly, before we outcompeted them, we interbred with them. As a result, up to four percent of most people's DNA is Neanderthal. This means that, in a sense, they're not entirely extinct; they live on in us. 

At the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, researchers, including Svante Pääbo, are studying the genetic differences between modern humans and Neanderthals. They hope to find the specific mutations that set us apart, that made us capable of creating complex societies, building technology, and dominating the planet. 

The discovery of other ancient hominid groups, like the 'hobbit' Homo floresiensis and the Denisovans, suggests our family tree is more complex than once believed. Yet, we seem to be the only branch left. 

So, what makes us humans different? Apart from our genetic makeup, it seems to be our relentless drive to explore, innovate, and conquer. It's a tendency that has brought us far, but also one that has caused a great deal of destruction. Our unique traits have made all the difference in our evolution and survival, but at what cost? Is our 'madness' for exploration and domination our greatest strength or our most dangerous flaw?

Did Our Human Ancestors Play a Role in the Extinction of Neanderthals?

In the Institute for Conservation Research at San Diego Zoo, there is a room filled with large metal tanks storing samples in liquid nitrogen. Among these samples were the last remains of the poouli, a beautiful bird species from Maui, now probably extinct.

This room, ironically named the Frozen Zoo, houses the world's largest collection of species on ice. It's a chilling thought that more and more species might end up here as extinction rates escalate. But do we really have to accept this grim reality? Can't we do something to protect these species?

People have shown time and again that they care about preserving wildlife. Groundbreaking laws have been passed, exotic species have been bred in captivity, and extensive anti-poaching measures have been implemented. But is it enough?

Take Kinohi, the Hawaiian crow. Kinohi is one of the hundred or so Hawaiian crows left in existence, all in captivity. He has an odd personality, not identifying with other crows or humans. Despite our best efforts, he has yet to mate, further threatening the survival of his species.

The story of Kinohi and the poouli are reminders of the severity of the sixth mass extinction event we are currently witnessing. Unlike past extinctions caused by natural events like asteroid impacts or volcanic eruptions, this one is triggered by human action. We've changed the world so drastically that we're outpacing the ability of species to adapt. 

So, where does this leave us? One possibility is that by destroying so much of the ecosystem, we're putting our own survival at risk. Or maybe our innovative spirit will save us, either by reversing the damage we've done or by finding new places to inhabit.

In the end, it's not just about our survival. We're deciding now, whether consciously or not, which evolutionary pathways will remain open and which will close forever. Our actions today will determine the course of life on Earth long after we're gone.

The Frozen Zoo: Our Last Hope in the Face of the Sixth Mass Extinction?

The mass extinction, resulting from human activities, is reshuffling ecosystems and introducing deadly pathogens like the chytrid fungus into new environments at an unprecedented rate. Can we halt this devastating trend? Is there a way to reverse the damage?

Our journey through the concept of extinction took us back to Aristotle, who never considered that animals had a history. The notion of extinction didn't exist until the naturalist Jean Cuvier, inspired by the American mastodon, developed the theory of cataclysmic extinction events. This theory evolved over time, influenced by Charles Darwin's revolutionary idea of species evolving gradually over time through natural selection.

Fast forward to the 21st century, scientists have coined a new term - the Anthropocene, to describe the current geological epoch where human activity is the dominant influence on the environment. The Anthropocene is characterized by unprecedented changes, such as alterations to the earth's biota due to human activity, including the transportation of flora and fauna across the globe. 

We are faced with the sobering reality of the Sixth Extinction, an event that is drastically altering our planet's biodiversity. Are we doing enough to protect our planet's biodiversity? Are we prepared for the repercussions of our actions? As we drive species to extinction, we are determining which evolutionary pathways will remain open and which will be permanently closed, a legacy that will endure long after we're gone. 

Home

Trending

Collections

Key Ideas & Notes

Insights

Highlights & Bookmarks

Listening History