Ever wondered how philosophers like Peter Kreeft and William Lane Craig reconcile faith with suffering and science? How does their journey of faith challenge atheism? How did Christian history's dark chapters like the Crusades and Inquisition influence their perception of faith? Dive into this captivating exploration of faith, doubt, and the pursuit of truth!

The Case for Faith: A Journalist Investigates the Toughest Objections to Christianity

As a young journalist fresh out of school, one of Lee Strobel's first assignments at the Chicago Tribune was a thirty-part series on impoverished families in Chicago. He was shocked by the contrast between the city's glamorous areas and the severe deprivation he witnessed. 

One family, led by the frail and sickly Perfecta de Jesus, lived in a tiny, barren apartment with almost no food. Her granddaughters shared a single sweater during their cold walks to school, and their situation mirrored the suffering Lee saw repeatedly.

This exposure to relentless hardship deepened Lee's atheism. He saw suffering everywhere: in prisons, hospitals, and slums, including a devastating visit to Bombay, where he met a hopeless, malnourished boy. He questioned, where was God in all of this? How could a loving God permit such suffering?

To explore this further, Lee spoke with philosopher Peter Kreeft, who argued that suffering doesn't necessarily negate the existence of a loving God. He likened our understanding of God's actions to a bear misunderstanding a hunter's intentions. Sometimes, God allows suffering for reasons beyond our comprehension, much like how a hunter might cause temporary pain to free a bear from a trap.

Kreeft also pointed out that the existence of evil implies an objective standard of good, which can be seen as evidence for God. He emphasized that God's omnipotence doesn't mean he can do the logically impossible, like creating free will without the possibility of evil.

He highlighted that suffering can lead to greater goods, using the crucifixion as an example. The worst event in history led to the greatest good: redemption. Suffering can also bring people closer to God, refining character and fostering reliance on Him.

Marc Harrienger, who suffered the tragic loss of his daughter, found that through his deepest pain, he experienced God's presence and comfort. His suffering led him to a new purpose, helping others in their own dark times.

Ultimately, Kreeft suggested that the answer to suffering is not found in abstract explanations but in the person of Jesus, who suffered alongside humanity. This presence offers comfort and hope, transforming suffering into a pathway to deeper faith and ultimate joy.

Reflecting on his conversations and experiences, Lee realized that while suffering remains a profound challenge, it also opens the door to encountering God in the midst of our pain. The presence of Jesus, who entered into our suffering, provides a powerful answer to the problem of evil and pain.

Can Suffering and Faith Coexist? Insights from a Chicago Tribune Journalist's Journey

Richard Dawkins, an atheist, dismisses miracles like the virgin birth and the resurrection as mere religious propaganda. Contrarily, Christian scholar Gary Habermas sees these miracles as evidence of God's compassion. 

While some might argue that miracles contradict science, others like nuclear physicist Hugh Siefken and philosopher William Lane Craig suggest that belief in both science and miracles isn't incompatible. Craig argues that if a Creator exists, the concept of miracles becomes plausible since natural laws wouldn't preclude divine intervention.

Craig defines a miracle as an event that natural causes can't produce and distinguishes between miracles and scientific principles. He uses the example of oxygen and potassium in the human body not combusting, asserting that the presence of other factors prevents it, not a violation of natural laws.

Regarding the resurrection of Jesus, Craig presents four widely accepted facts: Jesus' burial by Joseph of Arimathea, the empty tomb discovered by women, multiple post-crucifixion appearances of Jesus, and the disciples' sudden belief in the resurrection. He contends that no naturalistic explanation adequately accounts for these facts, suggesting divine intervention as the best explanation.

Craig believes that moral values, fine-tuning of the universe, and the origin of the universe all point toward the existence of God. He argues that objective moral values wouldn't exist without God, the universe's complexity implies an Intelligent Designer, and the universe's beginning indicates a transcendent cause.

Craig shares a personal story about his congenital neuromuscular disease. Despite praying for healing, he wasn't cured but sees how the condition shaped his life positively, aligning with the biblical idea that God's strength is made perfect in weakness.

Ultimately, Craig believes that faith in God can be rationally supported by evidence from science, philosophy, history, and personal experience. He concludes that experiencing God personally is akin to meeting someone face-to-face, making all supporting evidence secondary yet confirmatory.

William Craig's Rational Case for Miracles and the Divine

Charles Darwin, the father of evolutionary theory, inadvertently challenged the need for a supernatural Creator by explaining life's complexity through natural processes. Yet, despite the widespread acceptance of evolution, questions about life's origins persist, much like the flawed conviction of Ronald Williamson, who was wrongfully sentenced based on unreliable hair evidence.

In high school, learning about evolution led many to question faith. Scholar Patrick Glynn shared a similar journey away from religious beliefs after learning Darwin's theory. Evolution seemed to render divine explanations unnecessary, a sentiment echoed by many scientists and intellectuals. But is Darwin's theory the ultimate truth?

As Lee dived into the origins of life, he found parallels with the Ronald Williamson case. Just as the hair evidence overstated its implications, could evolutionary evidence have done the same? This suspicion led Lee to question whether life's complexity truly arose from unguided processes. During his investigation, he met Walter L. Bradley, a scientist who argued that life's origin suggests an Intelligent Designer.

Bradley highlighted the staggering complexity of even the simplest living cells, which far exceeds any human-made technology. He explained that life's building blocks—amino acids and DNA—pose immense challenges for naturalistic explanations. Despite optimistic theories, science has repeatedly hit dead ends in explaining life's origin without invoking a Creator.

Bradley and others argue that the intricate information encoded in DNA resembles written language, suggesting an intelligent cause. This perspective, once dismissed as unscientific, gains credibility as traditional theories falter. The analogy is clear: just as a single message from space implies intelligence, so does the vast information within every cell.

In essence, as scientists like Bradley and Tour explore the molecular realm, they find compelling evidence of a Creator. Like the flawed evidence in Williamson's trial, Darwinian explanations might have overstated their case. Thus, the quest for truth, much like a detective story, may lead us to reconsider the role of an Intelligent Designer in the tapestry of life.

Did Charles Darwin Overstate His Case for Evolution?

Walking into the White House amidst the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Lee sensed tension in the air. President Clinton, visibly exhausted, arrived late for breakfast with a small group of religious leaders. His tone was raw and emotional as he admitted, "I have sinned," seeking forgiveness from his family, friends, staff, and the American people. This moment brought into stark relief the importance of character in leadership for Lee.

Reflecting on Clinton's situation, Lee recalled his own journey from atheism, where he viewed Christians as adept at highlighting selective aspects of God's character while ignoring troubling Biblical narratives. Stories of divine brutality, such as the massacres and killings in the Old Testament, seemed to paint God as cruel and vengeful in his eyes. Critics like Charles Templeton and George H. Smith echoed this sentiment, questioning God's justice and worthiness of worship.

Lee sought clarity from Norman Geisler, a noted Christian apologist, who invited him into his office at Southern Evangelical Seminary. Geisler, with his vast knowledge and calm demeanor, addressed these difficult issues head-on. He explained the context and purpose behind God's seemingly harsh judgments in the Bible, such as the destruction of the Amalekites, who were utterly depraved and posed a threat to God's plan for salvation.

Geisler also tackled the emotional challenge of understanding why innocent children were caught in these judgments. He posited that in such thoroughly corrupt cultures, the children had no hope and that God's sovereign right over life meant He could take it if it served a greater purpose, such as allowing children to enter heaven.

Turning to the reliability of the Bible, Geisler emphasized its archaeological confirmation and the miraculous fulfillment of prophecies, arguing that these aspects uniquely authenticate the Bible as divinely inspired. He addressed common criticisms, such as alleged contradictions, by highlighting principles for interpreting Scripture correctly and resolving apparent conflicts.

Finally, they discussed the challenge of faith. Critics like Bertrand Russell claimed insufficient evidence for belief in God. Geisler countered that the evidence is clear for those willing to see it, pointing to scientific discoveries and fulfilled prophecies as persuasive proof of God's existence and the Bible's truth.

As their conversation ended, Lee was left contemplating the evidence and the importance of approaching these questions with an open mind, willing to explore beyond initial skepticism to find deeper understanding.

Clinton's Confession and the Quest for Divine Understanding: A Journey with Norman Geisler

In the heart of a bustling suburb in Atlanta, Lee found himself seated across from Ravi Zacharias, a gentle yet sharp intellect who has devoted his life to exploring the question: Is Jesus the only way to God? With a calm demeanor, he explained that Christianity is not alone in its exclusivity claims; other religions, like Islam and Hinduism, assert their own unique truths. Yet, the claim of Jesus as the sole path to God remains a contentious topic, particularly in our pluralistic world.

Zacharias, whose upbringing in India alongside Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs gives him a unique perspective, argues that truth, by its nature, is exclusive. In an engaging analogy, he likened truth to a scientific law—it stands firm regardless of opinions. He emphasized that while Christians may seem arrogant in their exclusivity, the same can be said of any truth claim, which inherently excludes what contradicts it.

The conversation shifted to how Christianity addresses life's core questions: origin, meaning, morality, and destiny. Zacharias passionately asserted that Jesus provides coherent and reality-aligned answers to these questions, unlike other belief systems. He pointed to the resurrection of Jesus as a cornerstone of Christian faith, offering both historical evidence and the hope of eternal life.

But what about those who haven’t heard of Jesus? Zacharias believes God is within reach of everyone, regardless of where they are born, and that those who genuinely seek Him will find Him. He shared compelling stories of people in isolated cultures encountering Christ through dreams or supernatural experiences.

Zacharias' own journey from a troubled teenager in India to a global defender of Christianity was deeply moving. After a suicide attempt, he found hope in the words of Jesus, leading to a transformative faith that fueled his life's mission.

For those still seeking, Zacharias offered this advice: approach the Bible with an open heart and mind, genuinely seeking truth. He confidently declared that in this search, one would find nothing as fulfilling as the teachings of Jesus. As the interview concluded, his words lingered: "Jesus is not just a way; for me, He is the way, the truth, and the life."

Can Ravi Zacharias' Unique Perspective on Jesus Transform Skeptics into Believers?

Bertrand Russell, an atheist, once noted that a humane person could not believe in everlasting punishment like hell. Conversely, Christian thinker G.K. Chesterton considered hell as a testament to human freedom and choice. This dichotomy occupied Lee's thoughts as he read about Judge Mathers, who found himself in a moral quandary over sentencing a destitute mother. He chose justice over strict adherence to mandatory sentencing laws, revealing the complexities of justice and mercy.

This case prompted Lee to ponder the Christian doctrine of hell, which he used to view as cosmic overkill—an unappealable sentence to eternal torment that seemed unjust. In search of answers, Lee interviewed J.P. Moreland, a philosopher and theologian, to dive into these challenging questions.

Moreland underscored that hell is not a torture chamber but a place of separation from God, the ultimate result of a life lived apart from Him. He contended that God's rules are not arbitrary but rooted in His nature as the most loving and just being. Moreland also clarified that the imagery of hell's flames and gnashing teeth are figurative, symbolizing ultimate loss and regret, not literal torture.

Addressing common objections, Moreland clarified that children would not be in hell, as biblical references to children often symbolize salvation. He also observed that there are degrees of suffering in hell, tailored to individual deeds, ensuring proportional justice. Moreland argued that eternal separation from God is a just consequence for the ultimate sin of rejecting God, who is infinitely good and deserving of our love.

Moreland dismissed the notion of God forcing everyone to heaven, as it would violate human dignity and freedom of choice. He also rejected annihilationism, arguing that God values human beings too much to snuff them out. Instead, hell respects human freedom and intrinsic value.

He explained that offering people a post-death second chance would diminish the moral significance of earthly life and would coerce a decision rather than foster genuine free choice. Moreland also refuted reincarnation as incoherent and unsupported by evidence.

Ultimately, Moreland acknowledged the discomfort surrounding the doctrine of hell but emphasized that truth isn't determined by our feelings. Instead, he encouraged seekers to trust in Jesus and let that trust guide them through their spiritual journey.

D.A. Carson, another theologian, concluded that hell is for those who persist in defying God and wanting to be the center of the universe, reinforcing the idea that hell is a monument to human dignity and choice. This perspective helped Lee see hell not as a stumbling block but as a complex aspect of divine justice and human freedom.

Bertrand Russell vs. G.K. Chesterton: Unraveling the Complexities of Hell with J.P. Moreland

History is filled with tales of both triumph and tragedy, and the narrative of Christianity is no exception. Some critics point to the Crusades, the Inquisition, and other dark chapters as evidence of inherent flaws within the faith. 

Others, like Christian historian John D. Woodbridge, argue that these events are anomalies, not reflective of Christianity's core teachings. Woodbridge highlights the rapid spread of Christianity due to the kindness and charity of its early followers, contrasting this with later abuses. He acknowledges grievous missteps but emphasizes the overwhelming positive impact of Christianity on the world, citing its foundational role in education, humanitarian efforts, and the development of moral frameworks.

Woodbridge shares personal anecdotes and historical insights to illustrate the complexity of these issues. He references the Crusades, acknowledging their brutality while explaining the historical context and motivations behind them. Similarly, he discusses the Inquisition and the Salem witch trials, pointing out the multifaceted causes behind these events and reminding us of the numerous instances where individuals within the church stood against such injustices.

The conversation also touches upon the contributions of missionaries. While some have criticized missionaries for cultural insensitivity and exploitation, Woodbridge argues that many were motivated by genuine compassion and a desire to improve lives, as demonstrated by his own family's missionary work.

In addressing anti-Semitism, Woodbridge admits to its dark presence in Christian history but underscores that it contradicts the teachings of Jesus. He stresses the significant positive changes Christianity has inspired, from challenging slavery to promoting dignity for all humans, as observed by scholars reflecting on Christianity's legacy.

Ultimately, the narrative is one of complexity: a tapestry of light and shadow that invites us to consider both the missteps and the profound contributions of Christianity to civilization. As history unfolds, the challenge remains to learn from the past while striving to embody the ideals that faith professes.

Can Christianity's Complex History Be Defined by Its Triumphs or Tragedies?

Dan Barker, a former pastor who became an atheist, believes that doubt is an integral part of faith. Madeleine L'Engle, a Christian author, agrees that true belief in God comes with uncertainties and struggles. This notion of doubt and faith is explored through the story of Ron Bronski, a reformed gang member whose transformation was initially met with skepticism by Lee. 

Despite Bronski's violent past, his genuine change and commitment to Christianity were confirmed by police, a prosecutor, and ultimately a judge who granted him probation instead of prison time. Bronski's story inspired Lee to reflect on his own skepticism towards Christianity and consider whether his doubts were genuine or a defense mechanism against the changes faith would require in his life.

Lynn Anderson, a Christian leader, shares his personal battles with doubt, which began in his childhood and persisted through his life. Anderson identifies different types of doubt, such as intellectual, rebellious, and those stemming from personal wounds or disappointments with God. He emphasizes that true faith involves a choice to believe, even amidst doubts, and that this choice is supported by evidence of God's existence and Jesus' divinity.

Dallas Willard, another influential Christian thinker, underscores that faith is a choice driven by a desire to know God. He argues that God has designed the world in such a way that people can explain away evidence of His existence if they choose to. This resonates with Lee's own experience as an atheist when he dismissed answered prayers as coincidences.

The narrative also highlights the transformative power of faith through the story of William Neal Moore, a former death row inmate who became a devout Christian and was released from prison due to his remarkable rehabilitation. Moore attributes his change to Jesus Christ, illustrating how faith can radically alter a person's life.

In essence, Lee's journey of investigating the toughest objections to Christianity reaffirms his faith, showing that while doubts are natural, they can coexist with belief. Faith is ultimately a decision supported by evidence and personal transformation, and it requires a willingness to embrace the truth and let go of pride and self-interest.

Doubt and Redemption: Lee's Journey with Faith and Transformation

Having worked as a young journalist, Lee was deeply impacted by the severe poverty and suffering he witnessed, which initially solidified his atheism. It was hard for him to reconcile the existence of a loving God with the widespread pain he encountered. Philosophical discussions with thinkers like Peter Kreeft helped Lee understand that suffering might have purposes beyond our comprehension, sometimes leading to greater goods and deeper faith.

Conversations with scholars like Gary Habermas and William Lane Craig presented compelling arguments for miracles and the resurrection of Jesus to Lee, suggesting that science and faith can coexist. Craig's insights into moral values, the fine-tuning of the universe, and the origin of life pointed towards the existence of a Creator, and his personal story of living with a congenital disease illustrated how faith can provide strength in weakness.

Exploring evolutionary theory, Lee found that the complexity of life suggests an Intelligent Designer, much like how intricate information in DNA implies a creator. This perspective challenges the sufficiency of Darwinian explanations for life's origins.

Engaging with Christian apologists like Norman Geisler, Lee gained a deeper understanding of difficult Biblical narratives and the reliability of the scriptures. Geisler's explanations provided clarity on God's justice and the fulfillment of prophecies, reinforcing the credibility of the Bible.

Ravi Zacharias's reflections on the exclusivity of Jesus as the path to God resonated with Lee, as Zacharias argued that truth is inherently exclusive and that Christianity offers coherent answers to life's fundamental questions. 

The doctrine of hell, initially a stumbling block for Lee, was reinterpreted through discussions with J.P. Moreland, who explained it as a consequence of ultimate separation from God rather than literal torture, respecting human freedom and choice.

Christian history's darker chapters, like the Crusades and the Inquisition, were contrasted with the faith's profound positive impact on the world by Lee, emphasizing the complexity of its legacy.

Finally, the role of doubt in faith was explored through stories of personal transformation, showing Lee that doubt and belief can coexist and that faith is a choice supported by evidence and personal experience. This journey reaffirmed for Lee that faith is not just about intellectual assent but also involves a commitment to embrace truth and transformation.

Home

Trending Books

News & Mags

Relax

Curated

Collections

Key Ideas & Notes

Insights

Highlights & Bookmarks

Listening History

The Case for Faith: A Journalist Investigates the Toughest Objections to Christianity

Lee Strobel

Ever wondered how philosophers like Peter Kreeft and William Lane Craig reconcile faith with suffering and science?

How does their journey of faith challenge atheism?

How did Christian history's dark chapters like the Crusades and Inquisition influence their perception of faith?

Dive into this captivating exploration of faith, doubt, and the pursuit of truth!

Key Ideas

#1