Ever wondered why some businesses succeed and others fail despite massive hype and investment? Curious about the real power behind brands like Apple, Coca-Cola, and IBM? How did companies like Toyota and Sun Microsystems, initially mocked or ignored, become industry disruptors? Want to know the secret behind Barbie's long-term popularity? Dive into the 22 marketing laws and discover how hype, unpredictability, acceleration, and resources can make or break a business.

The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing: Violate Them at Your Own Risk

1. The Law of Leadership:
In marketing, being first is more valuable than being better. Consider Charles Lindbergh, the first person to fly solo across the Atlantic—he's a household name. But who remembers the second, Bert Hinkler, even though he was a superior pilot? 

Brands that enter the market first, like IBM in computers or Coca-Cola in cola, tend to dominate. This principle extends to various fields: Heineken remains the top imported beer in the U.S., and Miller Lite leads in light beers. The first brand often becomes synonymous with the category, like Xerox for copiers or Band-Aid for adhesive bandages.

2. The Law of the Category:
If you can't be first in a category, create a new one to be first in. Amelia Earhart is famous not as the third person to fly solo across the Atlantic but as the first woman to do so. Anheuser-Busch introduced Michelob as the first high-priced domestic beer, capturing a new market. Similarly, Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) thrived by being the first in minicomputers, despite IBM's dominance in mainframes. When launching a product, focus on being "first" in a new category rather than being the best in an existing one.

3. The Law of the Mind:
It's better to be first in the mind than in the marketplace. The MITS Altair 8800 was the first personal computer but failed to capture the market. In contrast, IBM wasn't first with mainframe computers but became the leader by getting into people's minds first. 

Marketing success depends on perception; once a mind is made up, it rarely changes. Wang Laboratories couldn't shift its image from word processors to computers, and Xerox struggled to move beyond copiers. Apple succeeded with a memorable name and a strong initial impression, showing that even small marketing budgets can be effective if they target an open mind.

First Three Laws: Can Being First Trump Being the Best in the World of Marketing?

4. The Law of Perception:
Marketing isn't about the best product but about the perceptions customers hold. Imagine Honda in the US: it's a top car brand. Yet in Japan, Honda is seen as a motorcycle company, lagging behind Toyota and Nissan in car sales. This perception shapes the market, not the objective quality of the product.

Consider New Coke, which won taste tests against Pepsi and Coca-Cola Classic. Although it supposedly tasted better, it failed in the market. People’s perceptions, not the actual taste, determined the winner.

5. The Law of Focus:
Successful marketing is about owning a single word in the mind of the customer. Think FedEx and "overnight" delivery, or Volvo and "safety." These companies focus on one attribute, making it synonymous with their brand. 

Heinz's "slow" ketchup or Prego's "thicker" spaghetti sauce are examples of how narrowing focus to a single word or idea can capture significant market share. This focus not only simplifies the message but also strengthens the brand.

6. The Law of Exclusivity:
Two companies can't own the same word in the customer's mind. Volvo owns "safety." Any attempt by other car brands to take this word is futile. Federal Express tried to shift from "overnight" to "worldwide" to compete with DHL but struggled because DHL already owned "worldwide."

Similarly, Duracell owns the concept of "long-lasting" batteries despite Energizer’s efforts with its bunny ads. Burger King's attempt to claim "fast" food fell flat because McDonald's already owned that space. 

Marketing is a battle of perceptions, not products. Success comes from focusing on a single concept and owning it in the consumer's mind. Attempts to share or take over a competitor's word are often doomed to fail. By understanding and applying these principles, companies can navigate the complex landscape of consumer perceptions.

Mastering the Market: The Power of Perception, Focus, and Exclusivity in Branding

7. The Law of the Ladder:
Marketing success often depends on a brand's position in the consumer's mind, akin to rungs on a ladder. Hertz, being the first car rental company to establish itself, holds the top rung. Avis, the second, cleverly embraced its position with the slogan "We try harder," resulting in profitability after years of losses. In contrast, when Avis aimed for the top spot, customers remained loyal to Hertz, highlighting the importance of embracing one's position.

Adelphi University’s failed comparison with Harvard and Chrysler's futile attempt to rival Honda underscore that consumers trust brands that align with their mental ladders. High-interest products like cars and toothpaste have many rungs, while low-interest ones, like caskets, have few or none.

Acura, Lexus, and Infiniti's sales ratios illustrate a near-mathematical relationship in market share, emphasizing that leaders dominate. The "rule of seven" suggests that consumers rarely remember more than seven brands in a category. Sometimes, it’s advantageous to be a small fish in a big pond, as 7-Up demonstrated by marketing itself as the "Uncola," climbing the cola ladder instead of the lemon-lime one.

8. The Law of Duality:
Over time, markets evolve into two-horse races, with two dominant brands emerging. Examples include Eveready and Duracell in batteries, Kodak and Fuji in film, and McDonald’s and Burger King in hamburgers. Historical shifts like Coca-Cola and Pepsi’s market shares reflect this trend.

In long-distance telecom, AT&T leads, but MCI is expected to challenge it, leaving Sprint in a precarious third place. The downfall of Royal Crown cola and the ongoing struggles of Chrysler illustrate the difficulty of sustaining a third position in a mature market. Even in burgeoning sectors like video games and laptops, the law of duality predicts a narrowing to two main competitors.

Jack Welch of GE emphasized focusing on being No. 1 or No. 2, a strategy that has built powerhouses like Procter & Gamble, which leads in most of its product categories. As markets mature, consumers gravitate towards leading brands, believing they are superior.

9. The Law of the Opposite:
To secure second place, brands should leverage the leader's strengths against them. Pepsi effectively positioned itself as the choice of a new generation, opposing Coca-Cola’s established image. Brands must appeal to consumers who resist the leader, presenting themselves as the distinct alternative.

Scope mouthwash capitalized on Listerine’s “medicine breath” weakness by promoting its good taste. Beck’s beer positioned itself as Germany’s favorite, eclipsing American-made Lowenbrau. Similarly, Tylenol used aspirin’s side effects to its advantage, becoming the top-selling pain reliever.

Burger King thrived when it attacked McDonald’s with campaigns like “Have it your way” and “Broiling, not frying.” However, it faltered when it stopped opposing McDonald’s directly, resulting in declining sales. The lesson is clear: a strong No. 2 must consistently challenge the leader to maintain its position.

In essence, understanding your brand’s position on the ladder, recognizing the inevitability of a dual market, and leveraging the leader’s strengths are crucial strategies for long-term marketing success.

Can Understanding the 'Law of the Ladder' Skyrocket Your Brand's Marketing Success?

10. Law of Division:
Imagine the marketing world as a petri dish where a single category, like an amoeba, divides into multiple segments over time. This is the Law of Division. A perfect example is the computer industry. Initially, there were just "computers," but by the 90s there were mainframes, personal computers, laptops, and more. 

The same fragmentation has happened in the automobile industry, which started with just a few brands but now includes luxury cars, sports cars, SUVs, and minivans. Even television has divided from three main networks into a vast array of cable, pay, and streaming services.

This division isn't just confined to products; it also extends to countries. In 1776, there were around 35 sovereign entities, but today there are nearly 190. The music industry has also fragmented from just classical and popular music to numerous genres like rap, jazz, and country, each with its own top artists and charts.

Despite this clear trend, some corporate leaders still cling to the idea of synergy and convergence, thinking they can merge different categories successfully. IBM, for example, believed it could dominate the converging fields of television, music, and computing. But the reality is, categories are dividing, not combining.

One way to maintain dominance in a fragmented market is by creating different brands for each segment, as General Motors did with Chevrolet, Pontiac, and Cadillac. However, companies often make the mistake of using a single brand name across multiple categories, leading to failures like Volkswagen's attempt to sell larger cars under the same brand that was synonymous with their small, iconic Beetle.

11. Law of Perspective:
Shifting gears to the Law of Perspective, we see that marketing effects unfold over extended periods. Take alcohol as an example. At a bar, it seems like a stimulant due to the noise and laughter, but by early morning, its depressant effects are evident. Similarly, marketing moves like sales promotions can boost short-term sales but often harm long-term brand perception by training customers to wait for discounts.

12. Law of Line Extension:
Finally, the Law of Line Extension warns against the temptation to extend a brand across too many categories. IBM was highly profitable when it focused on mainframes but lost money when it expanded into personal computers, software, and more. Microsoft might be headed down the same path by trying to dominate every software category.

Line extension dilutes a brand's identity. For instance, A-1 Steak Sauce failed miserably when it tried to branch out into poultry sauce. Similarly, 7-Up's market share plummeted after it introduced multiple flavors. Despite overwhelming evidence against line extension, companies continue to pursue it, often mistaking short-term success for long-term viability.

In essence, to succeed in today's market, companies should narrow their focus, build a strong position in that niche, and resist the urge to be all things to all people. Whether it's IBM, Sears, or General Motors, spreading too thinly leads to disaster. Instead of chasing every opportunity, companies need the courage to stay selective and focused.

Mastering the Market: The Laws of Division, Perspective, and Line Extension in the Modern Business World

13.. The Law of Sacrifice:
Success often comes from sacrifice, not expansion. Look at Federal Express: it started by focusing solely on overnight small packages and became a leader. But when it diversified into global cargo, it lost $1.1 billion in 21 months. The same principle applies to companies like Duracell, which overtook Eveready by focusing exclusively on long-lasting alkaline batteries.

14. The Law of Attributes:
For every attribute a competitor owns, there is an opposite, effective attribute you can claim. Pepsi positioned itself as the choice of the younger generation to compete with Coca-Cola, which was seen as the drink for older people. Similarly, when Gillette dominated with high-tech razors, an upstart introduced disposables. Gillette responded with its own disposable razor and dominated that market segment as well.

15.. The Law of Candor:
Admitting a negative can turn into a positive. Avis’ slogan, "We’re only No. 2, but we try harder," resonated because it was honest. Similarly, Listerine admitted its bad taste but emphasized its germ-killing power, which turned the negative into a selling point. Honesty can disarm customers and make your positive attributes more compelling.

16. The Law of Singularity:
In any situation, one bold move will produce substantial results. General Motors once dominated the market with a broad range of cars, but when they made their models too similar, they lost their edge. Instead, companies should focus on one unexpected, bold stroke. For example, Coke can drop New Coke and re-emphasize being "The Real Thing" to counter Pepsi’s appeal to the younger generation.

These laws underscore that success in marketing requires focus, differentiation, honesty, and boldness. By understanding and leveraging these principles, companies can navigate competitive landscapes more effectively.

Can these Four Laws of Effective Marketing Revolutionize Your Business Strategy?

17. Law of Unpredictability: 
Imagine IBM’s ambitious OfficeVision project, which aimed to link all PCs to its mainframes. It seemed foolproof until unexpected competitors like Sun Microsystems and Microsoft derailed it. The lesson? You can't foresee every twist and turn in the market. Instead of rigid long-term plans, focus on adaptable trends. Consider ConAgra’s Healthy Choice line; by tapping into the health trend, they skyrocketed to success. But beware of overextending—too many line extensions can dilute your brand’s strength.

18. Law of Success:
Next, the Law of Success teaches us that triumph often breeds arrogance. Donald Trump’s ego led him to slap his name on everything, a classic mistake. Contrast this with Tom Monaghan of Domino’s Pizza, who recognized the perils of ego and stayed focused on what made his brand successful. Even giants like General Motors and IBM have fallen into this trap, losing touch with market realities and failing to innovate. Remember, success should drive humility and continuous adaptation, not complacency.

19. Law of Failure:
Finally, the Law of Failure reminds us that missteps are inevitable and should be accepted. Companies often scramble to fix failing projects rather than cutting their losses. American Motors should’ve focused solely on Jeep, and IBM should’ve exited the copier market sooner. Look at Wal-Mart’s “ready, fire, aim” strategy under Sam Walton; they embraced experimentation and learned from failures. This mindset fosters innovation and resilience.

By understanding these laws—embracing unpredictability, avoiding the arrogance trap of success, and accepting failure—you can navigate the complex landscape of marketing with agility and insight.

Mastering the Laws of Marketing: Lessons from IBM, Donald Trump, and Wal-Mart

20. Law of Hype:
Ever noticed how the loudest buzz isn't always about the best stuff? That’s the Law of Hype. Take New Coke, for instance. Despite a billion dollars' worth of publicity, it flopped spectacularly, and Coca-Cola had to bring back the original recipe. Or USA Today, which launched with fanfare involving top political figures but struggled to find its footing. Even Steve Jobs’ NeXt computer, despite massive hype and investment, failed to create a revolutionary niche.

Real game-changers often sneak up on us. When the first Toyopet cars arrived in California, they were mocked for falling apart, yet Toyota went on to dominate the auto industry. Similarly, MCI’s microwave service and Sun Microsystems’ workstations were initially ignored by the press but later became industry disruptors. The true revolutions aren't announced with parades; they grow quietly, only to be recognized in hindsight.

21. Law of Acceleration:
Then there’s the Law of Acceleration. Fads are flashy but short-lived, like waves, whereas trends are like the tide—subtle but powerful over time. Remember the Cabbage Patch Kids, a line of cloth dolls? They were a massive fad that led to Coleco’s financial ruin when the craze died down. In contrast, the Barbie doll, never over-merchandised, became a long-term trend and a staple in the toy industry. The secret? Don’t overexpose; manage demand to sustain long-term interest.

22. Law of Resources:
A brilliant idea is just the starting point; without adequate funding, it’s likely to go nowhere. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak had the genius of Apple, but it was Mike Markkula's $91,000 investment that truly launched the company. Even smaller companies like A&M Pet Products, which created the innovative clumping cat litter, often find themselves outpaced by well-funded competitors like Golden Cat Corporation. The truth is, success in marketing often boils down to who has the deeper pockets to drive their ideas into the minds of consumers.

So, whether you're dealing with hype, or the need to differentiate between fads and trends, remember: money is the fuel that keeps the marketing engine running.

Home

Trending

Collections

Key Ideas & Notes

Insights

Highlights & Bookmarks

Listening History