Ready to unravel the intriguing science behind decision-making? Ever wondered how biases like outcome bias and hindsight bias influence our choices? Want to discover the power of counterfactual thinking and the outside view? And what if you could save precious time by managing your decision-making process better? Dive in to uncover these secrets and more, and elevate your decision-making skills to new heights!

How to Decide: Simple Tools for Making Better Choices

Imagine you quit your job for a new one, and it turns out amazing—you love your coworkers, get a promotion, and feel fulfilled. Was quitting a good decision? Now, imagine the opposite—the job is a disaster, you’re miserable, and you get laid off. Was quitting a bad decision then? 

Most people would say yes to the first and no to the second without considering the decision process itself. This common phenomenon is called "resulting" or "outcome bias," where we judge decisions based on outcomes rather than on the quality of the decision itself. 

Consider this: you buy a stock, and it quadruples in value—great decision, right? But if it tanks, was it a bad decision? The truth is, the outcome doesn’t necessarily reflect the decision's quality. Good decisions can lead to poor outcomes, and vice versa, because of factors like luck and unforeseen circumstances.

A famous example is the film "Star Wars." Initially, several studios turned it down, including Disney and Universal. In hindsight, it seems like a terrible decision because the film became a massive success. However, at the time, the concept was risky and unproven. Judging the studios’ decision as poor based solely on the outcome ignores the complexity and uncertainty present during the decision-making process.

The key to better decision-making lies in understanding this distinction. By focusing on the decision process and acknowledging luck's role, we can learn more effectively from both successes and failures. This can prevent us from repeating poor decisions that just happened to turn out well or abandoning good decisions that were unlucky. 

So, next time you face a decision, think about the potential outcomes, but don't let them be the sole judge of your decision’s quality. Reflect on the process, the information you had, and how you can improve in the future. In doing so, you’ll become a more compassionate and insightful decision-maker, both for yourself and others.

Is Judging Decisions by Their Outcomes a Trap We're All Falling Into?

Growing up in sunny Florida and attending college in Georgia, you land two job offers—one in Georgia and a more promising opportunity in Boston. Despite your worries about New England winters, you visit Boston in February and decide to take the plunge. The winter, however, proves unbearable, and you eventually quit and move back home. You face a barrage of comments like, "I told you so!" and beat yourself up for not predicting the outcome.

Conversely, imagine the same scenario but you end up loving Boston. You enjoy the snow, take up snowboarding, and the job exceeds your expectations. Friends say, "I knew you'd love it!" and you wonder why you were ever worried about the weather.

This illustrates hindsight bias—believing an outcome was predictable after it happens. If things go wrong, it feels like you should have known. If things go well, it feels like you knew it all along. This bias skews your memory and distorts your perception of decisions.

Consider the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Post-election critiques of Hillary Clinton's strategy in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are rampant. Yet, before the election, these states weren't flagged as major concerns. The critiques emerged only after her loss, showcasing hindsight bias in political analysis.

To combat hindsight bias, use tools like a Knowledge Tracker to separate what you knew before a decision from what you learned after. This helps prevent memory creep and leads to more accurate reflections on your decisions. By acknowledging hindsight bias, you can improve future decision-making and have more compassion for yourself and others. Recognizing and addressing hindsight bias helps you learn genuinely useful lessons from your experiences.

Hindsight Bias: Lessons from Hillary Clinton's 2016 Election Strategy

Imagine you hate going to salons and decide to cut your own hair. This sparks an idea for an app called Kingdom Comb, connecting people who prefer at-home haircuts with mobile hairstylists. Confident in your vision, you quit your job, invest your savings, and secure funds from friends and family. 

Unfortunately, Kingdom Comb fails to gain traction, leading to financial loss and strained relationships. You find another job but now doubt your judgment on career and financial matters, hesitant to push new ideas.

Experience teaches us, yet we process it with bias, focusing on individual outcomes rather than the broader picture. This creates a paradox where a single result seems more significant than it is. To learn effectively, we must consider all possible outcomes.

Imagine you explore the decision multiverse, visualizing future possibilities like branches of a tree. Each decision opens multiple paths, some more likely than others. When an outcome materializes, we often forget the other branches, seeing the past as inevitable. Reconstructing the decision tree helps put outcomes in context, revealing that any single result is just one of many possibilities.

Kingdom Comb's failure isn't the whole story. It could have succeeded, faced legal challenges, or been outcompeted. Conversely, it might have thrived, attracted investments, and sold for millions, catapulting you into a successful tech career. The decision to pursue Kingdom Comb opened these possibilities, independent of the actual outcome.

Counterfactual thinking, or exploring "what-ifs," helps us understand the role of luck and the range of potential outcomes. This approach can alleviate the burden of negative results and temper our pride in successes, encouraging balanced learning from all experiences.

Consider past decisions and their outcomes. Reconstructing the decision tree for both good and bad results can shift your perspective on your responsibility and the influence of luck. This exercise underscores the importance of viewing outcomes within the broader context of possibilities, enhancing your decision-making skills and promoting continuous improvement.

Reflecting on counterfactuals, like in Philip K. Dick's "The Man in the High Castle," reminds us that our reality is just one of many possible worlds. Understanding this helps us better navigate our decisions, appreciating the complexities and uncertainties of life.

What Can "The Man in the High Castle" Teach Us About Navigating Career Failures?

Ever wondered how to make better decisions? It's all about learning from the past and creating a repeatable process for future choices. Making decisions is tricky because the past is already written, and the future is uncertain. But don't worry, there’s a six-step process to help you navigate through this uncertainty.

Imagine a bison blocking traffic at Yellowstone. A guy gets out of his car, thinking his impatience can move this massive animal. Without any research, you probably guessed the bison weighs between 800 and 3,500 pounds, because you have some knowledge about the weight of large animals.

This guessing game illustrates a key point: even without perfect information, you know enough to make an educated guess. It's better than nothing. This approach is crucial in decision-making. You need to consider possible outcomes, their desirability, and their likelihood.

Take a job decision, for example. Moving to Boston might have outcomes ranging from loving the job and city to hating both. By mapping these possibilities and their probabilities, you get a clearer view of the decision's quality.

A pros and cons list falls short because it doesn’t account for the magnitude or likelihood of outcomes. Instead, think like an archer aiming at a target. Your guesses, informed by what you know, help you get closer to the bull’s-eye, even if they aren’t perfect.

In 1906, scientist Francis Galton found that the collective guess of 800 people on an ox’s weight was nearly spot-on. This shows the power of educated guesses. When making decisions, apply what you know, guess when needed, and always aim to learn more. This mindset will significantly improve your decision-making over time.

Master Decision-Making with Insights from Francis Galton's Collective Wisdom

Andrew and Michael Mauboussin conducted a fascinating survey to understand what probabilities people associate with common terms. Their survey revealed a surprising range of interpretations for terms like "real possibility," which ranged from 20% to 80%. This exercise highlighted the ambiguity of natural language and the importance of precision in communication.

For instance, President Kennedy's approval of the Bay of Pigs invasion was based on his military advisers' term "fair chance," which he misinterpreted, leading to a significant failure. This underscores the need for clear communication, especially in high-stakes situations.

Using percentages to express probabilities can uncover disagreements and improve decision-making quality. For example, if someone says an event has a 30% chance and another person says 70%, the discrepancy is clear, leading to a productive discussion.

Precision not only helps in communication but also in self-assessment. By offering a range around an estimate, you signal your level of certainty and invite corrective feedback. This approach encourages seeking out new information and refining your beliefs, ultimately leading to better decisions.

For example, if estimating the probability of Mike Trout getting a hit, you might say there's a 30.5% chance, based on his career average. Adding a range, such as 25% to 35%, reflects your uncertainty and helps others provide more accurate feedback.

Practicing this method can significantly improve your decision-making by making you more aware of your knowledge gaps and encouraging you to seek out and integrate new information. This approach aligns with the practices of professionals like tax attorneys who use precise terms with agreed-upon meanings to avoid misunderstandings and ensure clarity.

In short, moving from ambiguous terms to precise probability percentages can enhance communication, reveal important disagreements, and lead to better decisions. It's a valuable skill that helps improve both personal and professional outcomes.

Can Precise Probabilities Have Prevented President Kennedy's Bay of Pigs Blunder?

Imagine having a friend who's perpetually unlucky in love, convinced they're cursed because every date turns out to be a jerk. Your role? The patient listener, offering a shoulder while silently wondering if it's really just bad luck. 

Maybe there's a pattern your friend is missing—a dating approach that attracts these so-called jerks. It's easier for you to see it because you're on the outside, detached from the emotional whirlwind. But when it comes to your own life, clarity fades. You're stuck in your own narrative, unable to see the "KICK ME" sign on your back.

This struggle isn't unique. We all tend to view life from our own narrow perspectives, making decisions based on beliefs that might be flawed. Our biases—like overconfidence or the tendency to seek confirmation—cloud our judgment. For instance, most people think they're better than average drivers, teachers, or social butterflies, though statistically, that's impossible. It's the inside view, a skewed perspective that often blinds us to reality.

To break free, we need the outside view—a perspective grounded in facts and statistics. Think of it as a reality check. If you're pondering a new venture, like opening a restaurant, knowing that 60% fail within the first year can temper your optimism. The outside view helps align your expectations with reality, much like how understanding that weather has little impact on happiness could influence your decision to move to a sunnier state.

Smart people, ironically, may be more trapped in the inside view, confident their beliefs are right. This can lead to motivated reasoning, where they twist facts to fit their narrative. To combat this, seek diverse perspectives. Invite others to challenge your views, even if it's uncomfortable. It's like having someone point out the spinach in your teeth—awkward but ultimately beneficial.

Consider your own dilemmas. Are you blaming bad luck for failed relationships or missed opportunities? Perhaps it's time to shift focus from luck to decision-making. Embrace the outside view, learn from past mistakes, and adjust your course. After all, recognizing the role of luck and skill in outcomes can lead to better decisions and a more grounded sense of self.

Breaking the 'Bad Luck' Myth: Embrace the Outside View for Better Decisions

Ever wonder how much time you spend each week deciding what to eat, watch, or wear? The average person spends around 150 minutes figuring out meals, 50 minutes on Netflix picks, and 90-115 minutes choosing outfits. That's up to 275 hours a year—equivalent to nearly seven workweeks—on seemingly minor decisions. This "analysis paralysis" could be eating up precious time that could be spent more meaningfully.

This is where decision-making skills become crucial. You need to find a balance—like Goldilocks—between speed and accuracy in your decisions. The real trick lies in understanding the penalties for making a less-than-perfect choice. For minor decisions, like what to eat or watch, the impact on long-term happiness is typically low. These are low-stakes choices where you can afford to decide quickly.

Imagine you agonize over what to order at a restaurant. A year later, you likely won't even remember what you ate, let alone let it affect your happiness. This tells you such decisions are low impact. By applying the "Happiness Test," you can identify decisions that don't significantly affect your long-term goals and thus speed up your choices.

Regret is another factor that can slow you down, making you fear the short-term pain of a bad outcome. But understanding that many decisions repeat—like eating or watching a new show—can help you move faster. If you make a poor choice, you'll get another chance soon.

Some decisions offer a "freeroll," where there's limited downside but potential for significant upside. Think of applying to a dream college or making an offer on a house above your budget. If you don’t get in or the offer is rejected, you're no worse off. Recognizing these opportunities allows you to act quickly.

When faced with closely matched options, like choosing between Paris and Rome for a vacation, the decision feels high impact. But if both are equally good, the small differences shouldn't paralyze you. If you’d be happy with either, you can decide quickly. The "Only-Option Test" helps here: if either choice alone would make you happy, then either will do.

Opportunity cost—what you give up by not choosing other options—also affects decision speed. Lower opportunity costs mean you can decide faster. You can also defray these costs by "quitting"—knowing when to cut losses and choose differently—or by making parallel choices, like sampling multiple menu items.

Big decisions often feel permanent, but many aren't. For example, many college students transfer schools. Realizing the option to change course reduces the pressure.

Embrace "satisficing"—settling for "good enough"—over maximizing, which often wastes time without significantly improving outcomes. This approach helps you make more efficient, effective decisions, freeing up time for what truly matters.

Are You Wasting 7 Workweeks a Year on Trivial Decisions? Here's How to Stop!

Think about beliefs you used to champion a decade ago, only to later question. It's easy to list those, isn't it? Now, try predicting which of your current beliefs you might doubt in the future. Tricky, right? This exercise reveals a natural bias—we can easily see past errors but struggle to foresee future ones.

Similarly, many of us start the year with resolutions, only to abandon them swiftly. The culprit? The "behavior gap," a term coined by Carl Richards to describe the chasm between our intentions and actions. It's easy to plan to eat healthily or save money, but much harder to resist the cake at parties or a tempting sale.

Positive thinking is often touted as the key to success, immortalized in books like "The Secret," which claims thoughts have magnetic power. Yet, there's a powerful case for negative thinking—imagining obstacles to better plan paths to success. This is where mental contrasting and prospective hindsight come in, tools that help anticipate and navigate potential failures.

Gabriele Oettingen's research supports this: those who visualize potential failures often achieve more, whether it's losing weight or acing exams. This approach is akin to using a navigation app that alerts you to roadblocks, versus an old paper map that shows only the destination.

Consider a premortem, a strategy proposed by psychologist Gary Klein, where you imagine why a decision might fail before it's made, allowing you to address potential pitfalls. This can be paired with a backcast, imagining why you succeeded to uncover the winning strategies.

These tools help individuals and teams avoid groupthink, encouraging diverse viewpoints. In decision-making, combining a premortem and backcast can illuminate the path to success, revealing both obstacles to dodge and strategies to embrace.

Your future success hinges on more than just setting goals; it's about preparing for setbacks and making smart precommitments—like Ulysses tying himself to his ship's mast to resist the Sirens' calls. This might involve creating barriers to bad habits or hedging against bad luck.

Even the notorious Darth Vader recognized the importance of negative thinking, albeit with a heavy-handed approach. His failure to conduct a premortem allowed the Rebels to exploit the Death Star's fatal flaw. Don't be like Vader—anticipate challenges, question your certainties, and plan for the unexpected.

Mastering Success: Lessons from Carl Richards, Gabriele Oettingen, and Darth Vader

In 1847, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis faced the perplexing challenge of high mortality rates from childbed fever in Vienna General Hospital. Amidst ghastly hospital conditions where doctors wore blood-stained gowns with pride, Semmelweis noticed that doctors and students often moved directly from autopsies to deliveries without washing their hands. 

When a colleague died after a cut during an autopsy, Semmelweis hypothesized that contamination from corpses was the cause. He instituted a handwashing policy, which dramatically reduced mortality rates. Despite his success, his superiors rejected his findings, clinging to the misguided belief that "gentlemen’s hands are clean." Semmelweis's career suffered, and he died in an asylum, ironically from an untreated infection.

This story underscores the importance of decision hygiene, not just in medicine but in our daily interactions. Just as doctors sanitize to prevent infection, we must be mindful of how our opinions can influence others. A simple experiment can illustrate this: when you share your opinion before asking others for theirs, you might find more agreement than if you withheld your perspective. This is because beliefs, like germs, are contagious.

This concept is echoed in Solomon Asch's famous experiment on conformity, where individuals often agreed with incorrect group opinions about line lengths due to social pressure. In decision-making, especially within groups, the adoption of independent feedback methods can prevent the dominance of high-status opinions and allow for a true diversity of perspectives.

To improve decision quality, it’s crucial to recognize the divergence of opinions as an opportunity for learning, rather than a threat. By soliciting feedback without tainting it with our own biases, we access a wider array of insights. Developing checklists for decisions can help ensure that all relevant information is considered, minimizing bias and enhancing the quality of the decisions we make.

Ultimately, whether in the operating room or the boardroom, maintaining decision hygiene by valuing diverse perspectives and withholding initial judgments can lead to more informed and effective outcomes, much like washing hands saved lives in Semmelweis's time.

How Did Ignaz Semmelweis's Handwashing Revolution Change Medicine Forever?

Reflecting on decision-making and the common biases that influence it, one major point is the tendency to judge the quality of decisions based on their outcomes, known as "outcome bias." It’s essential to evaluate the decision-making process itself, considering the information and context available at the time, rather than just the result. Good decisions can sometimes lead to bad outcomes due to factors like luck and unforeseen circumstances.

Another significant insight is the impact of hindsight bias, where we believe an outcome was predictable after it happens. This skews our memory and distorts our perception of decisions, making it crucial to separate what we knew before a decision from what we learned after.

Exploring counterfactuals, or "what-ifs," can help us understand the role of luck and the range of potential outcomes. This approach can alleviate the burden of negative results and temper our pride in successes, encouraging balanced learning from all experiences.

Additionally, applying the outside view, which relies on statistical and factual perspectives, can counteract our biased inside view. This helps align our expectations with reality and improves our decision-making skills.

Managing decision time effectively involves recognizing low-impact decisions, seizing opportunities with limited downside, and using strategies like quitting or making parallel choices. Embracing "satisficing"—settling for "good enough"—over maximizing can save time and reduce stress.

Finally, it's crucial to anticipate potential obstacles and plan accordingly. Tools like premortems, imagining why a decision might fail, and backcasts, imagining why it might succeed, can provide valuable insights. Seeking diverse perspectives and anonymizing feedback can also lead to better decisions and richer group discussions.

Overall, these insights emphasize the importance of understanding biases, considering multiple outcomes, and being mindful of the decision-making process to improve future decisions.

Home

Trending Books

News & Mags

Relax

Curated

Collections

Key Ideas & Notes

Insights

Highlights & Bookmarks

Listening History

Key Ideas

#1