Ever wondered how a news anchor overcame an uncontrollable blushing problem to shine on screen? Or how a computer outperformed a seasoned cardiologist at diagnosing heart attacks? Ever been curious about the intricacies of surgical training? Dive into these captivating narratives, offering insights into the fascinating world of medicine, technology, psychology and human resilience.

Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science

In his early days as a surgical resident, the daunting prospect of performing his first central line procedure loomed large for Atul Gawande, the author. He'd seen the chief resident, S., execute it twice, but now it was his turn. His patient, recovering from abdominal surgery, needed the line for intravenous nutrition. Despite his nervousness and the weight of potential mishaps he'd heard about, Atul assured him and began the procedure.

Armed with only theoretical knowledge and a shaky sense of confidence, Atul set about the task. His first attempt was a series of missteps, from forgetting to check the patient's platelet count to mishandling the guidewire. S. stepped in, guiding Atul to complete the procedure, reminding him that mastery would come with practice.

Surgical training is an exercise in persistence, a dance of trial, error, and eventually, learned skill. Atul's journey was marked by initial failures—like the time he turned a patient's chest into a pincushion with repeated failed attempts—before a breakthrough during a particularly challenging case with an obese patient. That day, everything clicked, and his confidence grew.

Surgery demands a relentless pursuit of skill through practice—often on real patients. The moral dilemma of learning at the expense of patient safety is ever-present, yet unavoidable. Atul's father's experience as a seasoned surgeon illustrates this ongoing learning curve, as medical innovations continuously challenge practitioners to adapt.

The truth is, no matter the safeguards, novices' early attempts inherently carry greater risks. Yet, for the future of medicine, training must persist, often hidden behind the guise of routine procedures. The stakes are high, as seen when Atul's own son required medical care, revealing his preference for experience over learning moments.

As Atul transitioned from learner to teacher, he faced the challenge of guiding a new resident through her own central line procedure on a frail patient. Watching her struggle reminded him of his early days, and the necessity of stepping back to let her learn, despite the impulse to intervene. This cycle of learning and teaching is the essence of surgical training, a testament to the resilience and dedication required to master the art.

Can Surgical Training Ever Balance Learning with Patient Safety?

In 1996, Swedish cardiologist Hans Ohlin faced off against a computer in a high-stakes challenge: diagnosing heart attacks from 2,240 electrocardiograms (EKGs). This was the medical world's version of the Deep Blue vs. Garry Kasparov chess match. 

The EKG, a common yet complex test, is crucial in detecting heart attacks, but human error remains a significant risk. Ohlin's task was to see if a computer could outperform a seasoned specialist like him. The computer, trained by artificial intelligence expert Lars Edenbrandt using thousands of EKGs, surpassed Ohlin by 20%, identifying 738 heart attacks to his 620.

This study highlighted the potential for machines to improve medical diagnostics, but it also sparked a debate about whether doctors should emulate machines in their precision. The Shouldice Hospital, a hernia repair center near Toronto, offers a glimpse into this concept. Specializing solely in hernia operations, their surgeons achieve remarkable results—lower recurrence rates, shorter surgery times, and reduced costs—through repetition and specialization, akin to a "focused factory."

However, the journey to machine-like precision isn't without missteps. The Morbidity and Mortality Conference (M&M) allows doctors to discuss mistakes candidly, focusing on learning rather than punishment. Yet, medicine, unlike industries like aviation, hasn't fully embraced systems thinking to reduce errors.

Anesthesiology, though, has made strides. By adopting aviation-style incident analysis and standardized equipment design, it has dramatically reduced anesthesia-related deaths. This success story suggests that medicine could benefit from a similar approach.

Ultimately, while machines and systems can enhance medical care, the human element remains vital. Doctors are crucial for understanding and guiding patients through complex emotions and decisions. The balance of technology and human touch will define the future of medicine, where machines assist, but doctors heal.

Man vs. Machine: The Heart Attack Diagnostic Showdown

“Are you going to the convention?” the attendant asked Atul. The attendant was referring to the American College of Surgeons convention. It seemed so prestigious, something his doctor parents had attended religiously for thirty years. 

During his residency, when the faculty surgeons left for the convention, the residents, including Atul, stayed behind, often lounging in their musty den, watching baseball, and eating take-out. But in his sixth year, Atul was invited to attend. The hospital even had a fund to cover the trip.

And so, there Atul was, on a plane to Chicago, leaving his wife and three kids behind, not knowing what to expect. At the convention center, he found himself among over nine thousand surgeons, a staggering number almost equal to the population of the towns he grew up in Ohio. The sheer scale of it all was overwhelming—surgeons everywhere, catching up, leafing through the dense program schedule.

Atul settled into his first day, circling sessions in blue ballpoint pen. There were so many options, ranging from breast biopsies to discussions about treating ano-rectal diseases. He decided to attend a panel debate about hernia repair methods. The auditorium was packed, with standing room only. Eleven surgeons argued passionately about the best techniques, tempers flaring, yet no consensus was reached. Despite this, the audience remained engaged throughout.

In the afternoon, Atul watched surgical movies showcasing daring, intricate, and ingeniously simple operations—all of which he found captivating. A surgeon from Memorial Sloan Kettering performed a delicate cancer excision from a pancreas, making it look effortless. 

Another team from Strasbourg removed a deep colon cancer laparoscopically, an almost Houdini-like feat. The most elegant procedure was performed by a Houston surgeon, who repaired an esophagus defect through the mouth in just fifteen minutes, no incision needed. Atul left the theater exhilarated.

The clinical sessions continued late into the night, ranging from pedantic to sublime. But the convention was also a massive trade show. Companies showcased new gadgets and technologies with dazzling displays. Atul found himself trying out harmonic scalpels on a turkey, sewing chicken meat with new sutures, and even participating in a live telecast of a hemorrhoid surgery.

Between sessions, Atul stumbled upon a booth selling antiquarian surgical books. There, he discovered Joseph Lister’s 1867 articles on antiseptic methods and William Halsted’s collected scientific papers. These genuine treasures provided a stark contrast to the commercial frenzy surrounding him.

Despite the carnival-like atmosphere, the convention was also about connection. On the shuttle buses, strangers sat together, talking like old friends. Atul met a surgeon from Michigan’s northern peninsula, shared stories with a general surgeon from Minnesota, and learned about Chinese hospitals from a British-accented vascular surgeon.

For Atul, the convention offered a rare sense of belonging. Surgeons, often isolated in their practices, found a temporary tribe—a nation of doctors who understood the unique pressures and experiences of the profession. It served as a reminder that despite the flaws and challenges, they were united in their pursuit of healing and knowledge.

Ever Wondered What Happens When Over 9,000 Surgeons Gather in One Place?

Jack Nicklaus carried three pennies during golf, Michael Jordan wore UNC boxers under his Bulls uniform, and Duke Ellington banned yellow on stage. Performers often cling to superstitions, and athletes are notorious for them. 

Baseball's Wade Boggs ate chicken before every game, and Tommy Lasorda chose pasta sauce based on the opposing pitcher's handedness. New York Mets pitcher Turk Wendell avoided socks and brushed his teeth between innings for luck, even demanding a salary ending in 99 cents. Yet, superstitions seem foreign to the rational world of doctors, especially surgeons.

One day, while scheduling ER duty, Atul's fellow surgical residents avoided Friday the thirteenth. Dismissing the superstition, he signed up for it, only to find out it coincided with a full moon and a lunar eclipse. Despite a study suggesting increased accidents on such Fridays, rationality prevailed—until that night. The ER was chaos, patient after patient, trauma after trauma. A nurse blamed the full moon and Friday the thirteenth, and Atul was too busy to argue otherwise.

Pain is another mystery for doctors. A Boston architect, Roland Scott Quinlan, suffered severe back pain following an accident, yet tests showed nothing. Doctors often dismiss such unexplainable pain as mental, but Quinlan's agony was genuine. Dr. Edgar Ross at Brigham and Women's Hospital deals with such chronic pain patients regularly, pointing out that social factors might trigger pain, much like Australia's temporary epidemic of RSI in the '80s.

The complexity of pain was further explored when neurosurgeon Dr. Frederick Lenz found that stimulating certain brain areas could trigger intense pain or panic attacks, suggesting that pain is generated in the mind, not just from injury. This led to new treatments targeting the brain's excitability, with promising drugs like Ziconotide and ABT-594 derived from natural venoms. Yet, the root causes of chronic pain often lie in social and psychological realms, not just physical ones.

Nausea, like pain, is a frequent yet poorly understood complaint. Amy Fitzpatrick's severe pregnancy sickness was debilitating, resisting typical treatments and leaving her bedridden. Nausea, often a protective response to toxins, can spiral out of control in cases like hyperemesis. Despite trying various drugs and therapies, Fitzpatrick found relief only in acceptance, bolstered by her faith and the prospect of her twins.

Doctors are learning to address suffering directly, not just symptoms. Palliative care specialists advocate for recognizing pain as a vital sign, aiming to alleviate suffering even when medical solutions fall short. 

Understanding the mind's role in experiencing pain and nausea leads to more compassionate and effective care, emphasizing the importance of social and emotional factors. Fitzpatrick's story highlights resilience in the face of inexplicable suffering, reminding us of the human capacity to endure and find meaning amid adversity.

Unraveling the Mysteries of Pain and Superstition

In January 1997, Christine Drury became the overnight anchorwoman for Channel 13 News in Indianapolis, a role that many aspiring journalists, including David Letterman, started with. She worked tirelessly from 9 PM to 5 AM, developing stories and delivering news bulletins. Despite her dedication, Drury faced an unexpected challenge: she couldn’t stop blushing on air. This involuntary reaction, which turned her face red, was a significant problem for someone in her profession. 

Growing up in Kokomo, Indiana, Drury always dreamed of being on television, inspired by local anchorwomen. She pursued her passion by majoring in telecommunications at Purdue University and eventually landing a job at Channel 13. Her bosses considered her an ideal candidate due to her writing skills, TV-ready voice, and wholesome appearance. However, her blushing was a persistent issue, leading her to try various remedies, from wearing turtlenecks to using concealer, but nothing worked.

Drury’s blushing was more than a physical reaction; it caused her significant distress and affected her performance. Blushing, a phenomenon unique to humans, is a complex interplay of physiology and psychology. It often happens not from shame but from the prospect of exposure or humiliation. Scientists have conducted various studies, including a notable one by Janice Templeton and Mark Leary, which revealed that people blush more when they see others' eyes, even if they're behind a one-way mirror.

Despite her efforts, Drury's career stagnated, and she became increasingly distressed, contemplating resignation. In a moment of desperation, she discovered an operation in Sweden that could potentially stop her blushing. The surgery, known as endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS), involved severing certain nerves to stop the blushing. After thorough research and against her parents' initial objections, Drury decided to proceed with the surgery in January 1999.

The operation was successful, and Drury felt transformed. She no longer blushed and found herself more confident and comfortable in social situations. Her on-air performance improved significantly, leading to a better job as a prime-time reporter. However, she soon realized that while the surgery had removed her blushing, it didn’t erase her self-consciousness. She struggled with feelings of being an impostor and the fear of others discovering her secret.

Ultimately, Drury learned to accept her new reality. She founded an organization to help others with chronic blushing and transitioned to a career in radio, eventually returning to TV as a freelance reporter. Her journey illustrates the deep connection between our physical and psychological selves and the complexities of overcoming personal challenges.

Did a Life-Changing Surgery Transform Christine Drury's Career?

Imagine being in a room with a grieving family, their loved one just passed, and you have to ask about an autopsy. It's a delicate dance—some doctors ask directly, others are more tactful. But with autopsies becoming rare, it's a question many avoid, even though it can provide crucial insights into medical mysteries.

Take the case of a patient Atul called Mr. Jolly. He was a cheerful retiree with a complex medical history. After a sudden death, they were convinced it was a pulmonary embolism. An autopsy told a different story: a ruptured aortic aneurysm. This revelation taught Atul that even with all our technology, we can still be wrong. Studies show autopsies reveal major misdiagnoses in about 40% of cases, a rate unchanged since the 1930s.

The decline in autopsies isn't because families refuse—they usually agree. It's that doctors don't ask, trusting modern diagnostics over the old practice. But as cases like Mr. Jolly's show, assumptions can lead us astray.

Consider Marie Noe, a woman whose ten babies died mysteriously. For years, doctors attributed the deaths to SIDS—a condition still not fully understood. Decades later, new scrutiny and a confession during a police interview suggested suffocation, leading to murder charges. This case highlights how science and human testimony often work hand-in-hand to unravel the truth.

Autopsies teach us that humans are neither simple nor fully comprehensible, residing somewhere between an ice cube and a hurricane in their complexity. They remind us that even when we think we know, there's always more to learn. So, when faced with uncertainty, asking questions—even of the dead—remains vital in our quest for understanding.

Unveiling Medical Mysteries: The Crucial Role of Autopsies

When Atul first met Joseph Lazaroff, Atul was a surgical resident facing a moral dilemma. Joseph lay frail, with cancer ravaging his body, yet he clung to the hope of surgery to prevent paralysis, despite the grave risks. This encounter highlighted the evolving landscape of medical decision-making, where patients like Lazaroff can choose their paths, even if it means enduring the very fate they wished to avoid.

In the past, doctors made decisions, often without consulting patients. The case of "Iphigenia Jones" in Jay Katz's book marked a shift, advocating for patient autonomy. Yet, autonomy has its pitfalls, as demonstrated by Lazaroff's tragic outcome, driven by a desire to stave off paralysis rather than accept the reality of his condition.

This struggle with decision-making was echoed in other cases, like Mrs. McLaughlin, who needed a gentle push to act in her best interest, and a mother in labor, where countless decisions needed careful negotiation. The art of medicine often lies in guiding patients through uncertainty, balancing autonomy with informed guidance.

In Atul's own life, when his daughter Hunter faced a critical medical decision, he realized that even as a doctor, he wanted others to bear the responsibility. The emotional weight was too much, highlighting the complexity of patient autonomy in practice.

The story of Eleanor Bratton, a young woman with a leg infection, further illustrates this complexity. Initially diagnosed with a common cellulitis, Atul's instinct, perhaps fueled by a recent experience, led them to consider the rare but deadly necrotizing fasciitis. The decision to operate was fraught with uncertainty, but it ultimately saved her life and limb.

These experiences underscore the delicate balance between patient autonomy and the physician's duty to guide. In the end, while medicine grapples with uncertainty, the goal remains to preserve kindness and competence, ensuring that decisions are made with empathy and expertise, even when the path is unclear.

Is Patient Autonomy in Medicine a Double-Edged Sword?

The journey from uncertainty to skill is a testament to the power of persistence and practice in medicine. Initially, the learning curve was steep for Atul, filled with errors and the moral quandary of gaining experience at the potential cost of patient safety. Yet, this is an inevitable part of medical training, where the path to mastery involves learning from mistakes and gradually building confidence.

Medicine, much like the story of machines in diagnostics, is about balancing precision with human intuition. While technology can enhance diagnostic accuracy, the human element remains crucial for understanding patients' emotions and guiding them through complex decisions.

Attending medical conventions can be overwhelming yet enlightening, offering a sense of belonging among peers and exposure to new surgical techniques and medical innovations. These gatherings underscore the collective pursuit of knowledge and healing within the medical community.

Superstitions, often seen in athletes, even find their way into the rational realm of medicine, revealing the human tendency to seek control amidst unpredictability. Similarly, understanding complex phenomena like pain and nausea involves recognizing the interplay between physiological and psychological factors, emphasizing the need for compassionate care.

The decline of autopsies highlights the importance of questioning assumptions and the value of continuing to learn from the deceased to improve medical understanding. Patient autonomy, while empowering, presents challenges in decision-making, where balancing guidance and respect for patients' wishes is key.

Ultimately, the practice of medicine is about navigating uncertainty with kindness and competence, ensuring decisions are made with empathy and expertise even when the path isn't clear.

Home

Trending Books

News & Mags

Relax

Curated

Collections

Key Ideas & Notes

Insights

Highlights & Bookmarks

Listening History

Improve your Career, Health & Life with 15min insights from 9000+ non-fiction books

Key Ideas

#1